Re: Suspicious line

2006-04-11 Thread Bill Pursell
Srinath Madhavan wrote: When I edit the Makefile after a ./configure in order to set my install prefix, GNU/Emacs warns me of a suspiscious line 115[1] before letting me save the Makefile. Question is whether I am doing something wrong? GNU/Screen source file: screen-4.0.2.tar.gz Source (online)

Suspicious line

2006-04-11 Thread Srinath Madhavan
When I edit the Makefile after a ./configure in order to set my install prefix, GNU/Emacs warns me of a suspiscious line 115[1] before letting me save the Makefile. Question is whether I am doing something wrong? GNU/Screen source file: screen-4.0.2.tar.gz Source (online): http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/s

Re: backtick metacharacter confused by scrolly wheel in vim

2006-04-11 Thread Ed Dench
printf "\033[?1000h" indeed, i was able to reproduce now. thanks. > paste that, it would paste "printf " to one window, \0 and switch to > window 0 and paste "33[?1000h" - made for some rather poor faux pas. yeah, i can imagine. i think you're right that it's quite the hassle, still key placeme

Re: backtick metacharacter confused by scrolly wheel in vim

2006-04-11 Thread Aaron Griffin
On 4/11/06, Alain Bench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That should be a lower case 'h', and echo -e "\e" behaviour is not > constant across various shells and /bin/echos. If you had GNU printf(1), > it would better be: > > | $ printf "\033[?1000h"# turn mouse reporting on > | $ printf "\0

Re: backtick metacharacter confused by scrolly wheel in vim

2006-04-11 Thread Alain Bench
Hello Ed, On Monday, April 10, 2006 at 23:37:07 -0400, Edward Dench wrote: > I have not been able to reproduce >| echo -ne "\e[?1000H" #turn mouse reporting on That should be a lower case 'h', and echo -e "\e" behaviour is not constant across various shells and /bin/echos. If you had GNU pr