Hi,
On Sunday 06 July 2008, Alexander Wagner wrote:
> Pascal Georges wrote:
> > > - be careful when stripping Scid (books, DB, etc...) as it
> > > breaks some features, and I don't like this.
> >
> > Actually, some parts of scid would plainly not allow it to
> > make it into som
2008/7/6 Alexander Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Pascal Georges wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I do not get how you want to set it up: Scid links to
>>http://www.somehwere.org/scid-binaries/
>>and the list is maintained there? You think probably of a
>>Wiki-like target for this so everybody co
Pascal Georges wrote:
Hi!
> I do not get how you want to set it up: Scid links to
> http://www.somehwere.org/scid-binaries/
> and the list is maintained there? You think probably of a
> Wiki-like target for this so everybody could hook up links
> to his individual builds?
>
>
2008/7/6 Alexander Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Pascal Georges wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > - I'd prefer not putting links to pre-built packages on
> > Scid's SF site, simply due to maintenance reasons. But
> > those links are of highest interest to end users, so if
> > someone wants to take care of this
Pascal Georges wrote:
Hi!
> My opinion on binary releases :
> - build scripts should be incorporated in Scid repository,
> easying maintenance,
This is somewhat into the direction of adding
--debian/--fedora/--whatever flags to the configure. Of
course external script are in order as well. Agree
Hi,
My opinion on binary releases :
- build scripts should be incorporated in Scid repository, easying
maintenance,
- I'd prefer not putting links to pre-built packages on Scid's SF site,
simply due to maintenance reasons. But those links are of highest interest
to end users, so if someone wants t
:)
>
> > Unfortunately some part of the scid (data files) has
> > rather restrictive licence and can't be included in Fedora
> > (and many other distributions).
>
> Yes, this is an issue with Debian as well. Actually, one of
> the reasons why I'd prefer to split the scid package into
> the core and
Hi!
Alexander Wagner wrote:
>
> Is it reasonable to put precompiled binaries for popular
>> distributions on the sf project page?
>>
>
> IMHO the best way would be for scid to make it into the
> Fedora distribution.
I will think on this subject.
> The other way would be an easy way to
> build
Mikhail Kalenkov wrote:
Hi!
> I built and tested (!) scid package for the Fedora 9. Precompiled
> binaries can be found here
> http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/
Welcome to the club. :)
> Unfortunately some part of the scid (data files) has
> rather restrictive licence and can't be included in Fe
Hi all,
I built and tested (!) scid package for the Fedora 9. Precompiled binaries
can be found here
http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/
Unfortunately some part of the scid (data files) has rather restrictive
licence and can't be included in Fedora (and many other distributions).
Is it reasonable to
10 matches
Mail list logo
