Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-18 Thread Alexander Wagner
pgeorges wrote: Hi! >> The directory Inbox exists right below the scid >> executable (or actually the path where you invoked scid)? >> Did you try an absolute path? > Yes. Ok. Admitting that it makes me wonder as it drops my idea ;) >> If the path exists: if you fetch the games via Xfcc it

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-18 Thread pgeorges
Alexander Wagner a écrit : > Pascal Georges schrieb: > > Hi! > > > I still can't retrieve games list : I checked "use > > internal Xfcc support" , but after "retrieve games" I get > > the following error : "Your Inbox at ./Inbox does not > > contain any game", as if the "inbox" was processed

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-17 Thread Alexander Wagner
Pascal Georges schrieb: Hi! > I still can't retrieve games list : I checked "use > internal Xfcc support" , but after "retrieve games" I get > the following error : "Your Inbox at ./Inbox does not > contain any game", as if the "inbox" was processed before > any real fetch or something li

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-17 Thread Pascal Georges
2008/3/16, Alexander Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Thanks for the testing! Its just that one does not come > accross all the problems in self testing. You'll also notice > that I fixed a more crucial bug in case you'll send a move > for you son. This works only till this afternoons cvs > versio

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-16 Thread Alexander Wagner
Pascal Georges wrote: Hi! > I did not check CVS for a couple of days. I will look at > it, but trying correspondence chess is not easy for me as > I need to borrow my son's account, and he does not like > that so much ;-) Thanks for the testing! Its just that one does not come accross all the p

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-16 Thread Alexander Wagner
Pascal Georges wrote: Hi! Ups, should have sent it to the list as well. > - it would be nice to generate on the fly the xfccrc file with the > username/password that user inputs; This is possible though I don't know wether it makes much sense as CC takes some times involving always fetching t

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-16 Thread Alexander Wagner
Pascal Georges wrote: Hi again! > - when checking an account with no running game, there is an error > ("retrieve games") : > Invalid game number. Fixed in cvs, I think. But please check that you've a valid inbox directory set up. (I'll add some check for this but this is a bit more involved

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-16 Thread Pascal Georges
Hi, I tested xfcc support and here are my remarks : - it would be nice to generate on the fly the xfccrc file with the username/password that user inputs; - in config dialog, pressing Ok triggers an error about an unknown variable w - when checking an account with no running game, there is an erro

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-13 Thread Alexander Wagner
Michal Rudolf schrieb: Hi! > I like XFCC support, but I have one request: can you make > toolbar icons for it optional? I use Scid on laptop and > they take too much space, making whole window bigger, > which is a problem on a small screen. The recent edition moves them to the correspondence

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-13 Thread Michal Rudolf
Alexander Wagner, czwartek, 13 marca 2008: >Alexander Wagner schrieb: > >Hi! > >Yestereve I checked in a reworked edition of the >correspondence chess code for scid adding some ideas from >Austin (SchemingMind) which we discussed in PM and a >reworked interface. Also I fixed some bugs found by JJ

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-13 Thread Alexander Wagner
Alexander Wagner schrieb: Hi! Yestereve I checked in a reworked edition of the correspondence chess code for scid adding some ideas from Austin (SchemingMind) which we discussed in PM and a reworked interface. Also I fixed some bugs found by JJ in testing the stuff and some typoes, one of them un

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-08 Thread Pascal Georges
2008/3/8, Alexander Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Actually here I like the notion that it was just a bug in your brain and > you got the wrong package installed. I'll add a suitable error message > of course. > > I'm polishing the interface right now (you might have noticed in cvs) > hence there

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-08 Thread Alexander Wagner
pgeorges wrote: Hi! > This is not a bug in Suse's packages, but one of my brain :-[ > > I installed latest Opensuse 10.3 and noticed there is a tdom package on > the DVD that is sufficient to install and now "package require tdom" > works well. I think the package naming would having been clea

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-08 Thread pgeorges
Alexander Wagner a écrit : > pgeorges wrote: > > Hi! > > >> This is a stable SuSE? Or some of this Open-Ever-Beta > >> stuff? That is: could it just be a bug in SuSE? Probably > >> solved by some of their updates? > >> > > I use SLED 10.1, supported by Suse. I also checked on Windows > > (ActiveSta

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-08 Thread Alexander Wagner
pgeorges wrote: Hi! >> This is a stable SuSE? Or some of this Open-Ever-Beta >> stuff? That is: could it just be a bug in SuSE? Probably >> solved by some of their updates? >> > I use SLED 10.1, supported by Suse. I also checked on Windows > (ActiveState Tcl) and tdom is present. So it is

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-07 Thread pgeorges
Alexander Wagner a écrit : > Pascal Georges wrote: > > Hi! > > > On my Suse distro I get a crash after "package require > > tdom" ... > > That's bad news... > > This is a stable SuSE? Or some of this Open-Ever-Beta > stuff? That is: could it just be a bug in SuSE? Probably > solved by some of the

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-07 Thread Alexander Wagner
Pascal Georges wrote: Hi! > On my Suse distro I get a crash after "package require > tdom" ... Would it be possible to incorporate the > necessary code in Scid ? As a workaround I wrote catch { > package require tdom } so Scid can be launched, but for > the least this exception should be ca

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-07 Thread Alexander Wagner
Pascal Georges wrote: Hi! > On my Suse distro I get a crash after "package require > tdom" ... That's bad news... This is a stable SuSE? Or some of this Open-Ever-Beta stuff? That is: could it just be a bug in SuSE? Probably solved by some of their updates? I guess you have the tdom package

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-07 Thread Pascal Georges
Hi Alexander, On my Suse distro I get a crash after "package require tdom" ... Would it be possible to incorporate the necessary code in Scid ? As a workaround I wrote catch { package require tdom } so Scid can be launched, but for the least this exception should be caught if no other solution is

[Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-07 Thread Alexander Wagner
Hi! I just checked in the first version of internal Xfcc support for scid into cvs, ie. a pure tcl implementation not requiring any exteranl tools anymore (but I'll continue to allow for them as I feel interfaces the most important). As I did just translate my perl toolchain to tcl I expect it to