Re: [Scid-users] Symbolic NAGs

2009-04-18 Thread Alexander Wagner
Michal Rudolf wrote: Hi! >>> In fact, I wonder if those are ever used properly or is >>> it used like both zugzwang symbols - there is only one >>> symbol and random NAG from 3*2 possible is used by >>> annotators. >> At least those Informant games I have and checked use >> the NAGs in numeric v

Re: [Scid-users] Symbolic NAGs

2009-04-17 Thread Michal Rudolf
Alexander Wagner, piątek, 17 kwietnia 2009: >> In fact, I wonder if those are ever used properly or is it >> used like both zugzwang symbols - there is only one symbol >> and random NAG from 3*2 possible is used by annotators. >At least those Informant games I have and checked use the >NAGs in nu

Re: [Scid-users] Symbolic NAGs

2009-04-17 Thread Alexander Wagner
Michal Rudolf wrote: Hi! > Is interpreting $132 (White has moderate counterplay) as > ⇄⇄ common? I'm not sure about this, but how to distinguish them properly otherwise? > In fact, I wonder if those are ever used properly or is it > used like both zugzwang symbols - there is only one symbol > a

Re: [Scid-users] Symbolic NAGs

2009-04-16 Thread Michal Rudolf
Alexander Wagner, środa, 15 kwietnia 2009: Is interpreting $132 (White has moderate counterplay) as ⇄⇄ common? I don't think I have seen using 2 or 3 repeated symbols to mark slight/moderate/decisive time advantage/counterplay. In fact, I wonder if those are ever used properly or is it used lik

Re: [Scid-users] Symbolic NAGs

2009-04-15 Thread Alexander Wagner
Hi! > > Just worked on smybolic NAGs today and rechecked if to use > > ASCII or UTF. For some reasons I'd actually prefer UTF chars > > (they need much less space in the annotations e.g.) and I'd > > come up with the list below. > > Just committed the first version of thi

Re: [Scid-users] Symbolic NAGs

2009-04-15 Thread Pascal Georges
2009/4/14 Alexander Wagner > Alexander Wagner wrote: > > Hi! > > > Just worked on smybolic NAGs today and rechecked if to use > > ASCII or UTF. For some reasons I'd actually prefer UTF chars > > (they need much less space in the annotations e.g.) and I'd > > come up with the list below. > > Just

Re: [Scid-users] Symbolic NAGs

2009-04-14 Thread Alexander Wagner
Alexander Wagner wrote: Hi! > Just worked on smybolic NAGs today and rechecked if to use > ASCII or UTF. For some reasons I'd actually prefer UTF chars > (they need much less space in the annotations e.g.) and I'd > come up with the list below. Just committed the first version of this Symbolic N

[Scid-users] Symbolic NAGs

2009-04-12 Thread Alexander Wagner
Hi! Just worked on smybolic NAGs today and rechecked if to use ASCII or UTF. For some reasons I'd actually prefer UTF chars (they need much less space in the annotations e.g.) and I'd come up with the list below. Suggestions for improvement? Should chars change? There're also a bunch of NAGs lack