pgeorges wrote:
> Michal Rudolf a écrit :
>
>>I agree that you have some points. But I am still against one of two forks
>>taking Scid name. If you agree to maintain just one, I am more inclined to
>>support using Scid's name.
>>
>
>
> So if I understand well you propose 2 scenarios :
> S1 :
pgeorges, poniedziałek, 12 lutego 2007:
>So if I understand well you propose 2 scenarios :
>S1 :
>Scid -> let it die
>2 forks : projects A and B
Suggestion: link to both A and B from Scid. Wait some time and see how both
projects are doing. If one is doing better (development pace/users) put it
Michal Rudolf a écrit :
> I agree that you have some points. But I am still against one of two forks
> taking Scid name. If you agree to maintain just one, I am more inclined to
> support using Scid's name.
>
So if I understand well you propose 2 scenarios :
S1 :
Scid -> let it die
2 forks :
pgeorges, poniedziałek, 12 lutego 2007:
>So, suppose shane never updates Scid : then Scid is a dead project, right ?
>Suppose there are forks (any fork is insane for me in open source
>world), and Shane wants to continue Scid development (in 2007 ? in 2010
>?). What can he do ? Try to catch up an
So, suppose shane never updates Scid : then Scid is a dead project, right ?
Suppose there are forks (any fork is insane for me in open source
world), and Shane wants to continue Scid development (in 2007 ? in 2010
?). What can he do ? Try to catch up and merge projects with different
names, tha
> I agree, especially that there are two independent versions being developed.
I do not understand why there are two efforts underway.
Specifically, Pascal, I do not understand why you have decided
to start your own effort. As far as I can tell, Dr. Kirby is
leading the older and more vibrant ef
Dr. David Kirkby, poniedziałek, 12 lutego 2007:
>There has been several comments on the mailing list about Shane not
>liking people meddling with his code. Given the code is GPL'ed, he
>really should not object, but I believe he has done. So I can't help but
>feel he would object to someone taking
pgeorges wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I requested the take over of Scid at sourceforge. I will see if this
> works (Scid is already flagged as APT = Abandoned Project Takeover)
> I did it because latest downloadable files are from 2004 and Shane and
> admins are unavailable, except martin skjoldebrand that
Hi,
I requested the take over of Scid at sourceforge. I will see if this
works (Scid is already flagged as APT = Abandoned Project Takeover)
I did it because latest downloadable files are from 2004 and Shane and
admins are unavailable, except martin skjoldebrand that seems really
busy and/or wi
