Pascal Georges wrote:
Hi!
> I quickly checked under Windows XP, and NAG symbols seem to be
> correctly displayed.
Thanks. That seems good news :)
--
Kind regards,/ War is Peace.
|Freedom is Slavery.
Alexander Wagner
I quickly checked under Windows XP, and NAG symbols seem to be
correctly displayed.
Pascal
--
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200
Pascal Georges wrote:
Hi!
> 2009/4/14, Alexander Wagner :
>> Alexander Wagner wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>>> Just worked on smybolic NAGs today and rechecked if to use
>>> ASCII or UTF. For some reasons I'd actually prefer UTF chars
>>> (they need much less space in the annotations e.g.) and I'd
>>> com
Pascal Georges, środa, 15 kwietnia 2009:
>Maybe this is useless, but in case : if there are problems handling
>Unicode chars, why not use images inserted as chars ? That is parse
>the text output and replace on the fly the $xx occurences by bitmaps ?
>Certainly not a perfect solution and an ugly w
2009/4/14, Alexander Wagner :
> Alexander Wagner wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> Just worked on smybolic NAGs today and rechecked if to use
>> ASCII or UTF. For some reasons I'd actually prefer UTF chars
>> (they need much less space in the annotations e.g.) and I'd
>> come up with the list below.
>
> Just com
Pascal Georges wrote:
Hi!
>> Additionally, what do you think would be a good GUI solution
>> to enter these NAGs? At the moment I allow for some keyboard
>> entry of say □ just as [] and so on (I could give a
>> transcription of this) but I think some graphical
>> representation to select from is
2009/4/12, Alexander Wagner :
> Additionally, what do you think would be a good GUI solution
> to enter these NAGs? At the moment I allow for some keyboard
> entry of say □ just as [] and so on (I could give a
> transcription of this) but I think some graphical
> representation to select from is n
