Well, those flamewars fortunately are more or less over,
at least I haven't seen them for quite a lot of time.
So - there is no reason to recover them.
And let us stop on it.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
D
Technically SCID is not presently being developed, but two forks, ChessDB and
SCID-pg, are under active development.
I made the mistake of stepping into this cow pie of an argument when I posted a
positive review of ChessDB at my web site. I had no idea of all the
controversy, and people starte
Okay, thank you. I did not realize that there were later versions than the
ones by the original author at Sourceforge. When I googled SCID, I came up
with that "official" site, and assumed that was it. Your message was enough
of a hint that I found this site, http://prolinux.free.fr/scid/, whic
Marc Plum a écrit :
> First, let me acknowledge that this question is probably fully covered
> in the mailing list archives. However, when I try to search there on
> the Sourceforge site, I get a message that I don’t have sufficient
> privileges. I also don’t see a version history on the SCID So
> I’m curious as to what the differences are between version 3.5.x and
> 3.6.1 of SCID. Is it mostly bugfixes, or are there significant
> functional enhancements?
Well I do not know. But there are a LOT of important enhancements
between scid 3.6.1 (which is also ancient) and scid 3.6.18 (th
First, let me acknowledge that this question is probably fully covered in
the mailing list archives. However, when I try to search there on the
Sourceforge site, I get a message that I don¹t have sufficient privileges.
I also don¹t see a version history on the SCID Sourceforge page. So I¹ll
just