Wrapper looks like a good idea. I will revisit this when I get time.
Shiv
From: Alexander Wagner
To: shiv shivaji
Cc: Pascal Georges ; scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Mon, November 9, 2009 9:39:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Scid-users] Prodeo in Scid
shiv
shiv shivaji wrote:
Hi!
> I doubt this is possible anymore given that Ed is not working on Prodeo
> anymore. Prodeo is closed source.
Closed source is always a bad thing, as we can see again.
Still, as it seems to be a pretty good engine for playing. I was told by
many people that they favour
1:29:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Scid-users] Prodeo in Scid
For me the only acceptable solution is that Prodeo is patched to comply to UCI
standard.
Pascal
2009/11/8 shiv shivaji
The talkchess.com community reported a problem with Prodeo and Scid.
>>I did some debugging and found out that the
For me the only acceptable solution is that Prodeo is patched to comply to
UCI standard.
Pascal
2009/11/8 shiv shivaji
> The talkchess.com community reported a problem with Prodeo and Scid.
> I did some debugging and found out that there are 2 engine issues with
> Prodeo and Scid
>
> Problem #1
The talkchess.com community reported a problem with Prodeo and Scid.
I did some debugging and found out that there are 2 engine issues with Prodeo
and Scid
Problem #1: Prodeo does not seem to analyze according to the UCI
specifications.
On the command line I tried:
uci
isready
position fen
