Pascal Georges wrote:
Hi!
> Homer would be another that offers this feature, but I do
> not know about quality of implementation.
>
> I did not know that engine. I will try it.
http://www.homer-chess.com/
(Rybka 2.2n would be here:
http://www.rybkachess.com/index.php?auswahl=Demo+vers
2009/3/9 Alexander Wagner
> Pascal Georges wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> To play against Scid with a weakened engine is a good
>> training tool (and certainly entertaining). Some engine
>> offers this but are badly implemented (for example
>> reducing the number of nodes, choosing a random move)
>> which d
Pascal Georges wrote:
Hi!
> To play against Scid with a weakened engine is a good
> training tool (and certainly entertaining). Some engine
> offers this but are badly implemented (for example
> reducing the number of nodes, choosing a random move)
> which does not really gives nice tactical shot
Personnally, I'd prefer to play with handicaps for serious training.
But it's a usual functionality, so it might be a good idea anyway.
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC
Hi,
To play against Scid with a weakened engine is a good training tool (and
certainly entertaining). Some engine offers this but are badly implemented
(for example reducing the number of nodes, choosing a random move) which
does not really gives nice tactical shots and an human style of play. The
