2008/9/21 Alexander Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> By the way I find some dialog boxes in Scid a bit ugly ...
>>
>
> What do you have in mind here and what is your definition of
> "ugly"? Just in case some of those few I did need
> improvement.
>
The various options are not always aligned and gro
Pascal Georges wrote:
Hi!
>> crosschecking with another engine... However, the
>> engine eval values in the graphical display might be
>> very usefull to identify a blunder one made. To graph
>> it, well one needs the values first. One could then
>> probably check in more eas
Pascal Georges wrote:
Hi!
> This means another option in an overcrowded dialog box
> (that even does not fit in low resolution screens).
Life is a complex thing. Nobody ever stated it is simple.
> Is it a really useful thing ?
Up to discussion, thats why I worte this mail anyway ;)
I'd find i
2008/9/15 Alexander Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi!
>
> I'm currently playing arround with the annotation feature of
> Scid. Some comments here:
>
> - I'd find it usefull if I could just add the engines
> evaluation values (without the actual lines). This just
> results in a "generate score g
Hi!
I'm currently playing arround with the annotation feature of
Scid. Some comments here:
- I'd find it usefull if I could just add the engines
evaluation values (without the actual lines). This just
results in a "generate score graph" function.
E.g. in games where I added my own varia