[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> If I had continued with chessDB I would not have been able to work at this
> pace
> and having fun doing it.
>
OK, at least I tried. I wish you to have fun developping Scid-pg.
Personaly, I will try as much as possible to contribute to ChessDB in
which I trust. I
Selon Jean-Renaud Seret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Bonjour,
> I recognize you developped interesting and powerful features inside the
> so called Scid-pg. That you released patches, plugins or full releases
> is not the point. You are working in a solo mode, and that is the wrong
> way. That's what my
pgeorges a écrit :
> If you want to continue Scid development : go ahead, ask for a take over
> at SF, this will be less burden for me.
>
> If you want to take benefits from others code (put your name in so many
> files where you did not change anything), then continue ChessDB.
>
> I wish we coul
Jerry, thx for the well thought comments.
>
> Further, I started out feeling that you had proposed a good feature;
> Dr. Kirby wrote a response that persuaded me that it was not appropriate
> for ChessDB.
That´s an important point. ChessDB follows the "intentions" (in my view at
least) of scid
Jeremy White wrote:
> I believe Dr. Kirby has been nothing but gracious and respectful
> of Shane's work.
>
> Read this from the opening screen of ChessDB:
>
> ChessDB is based on Scid - http://scid.sourceforge.net/
> but has new features, enhancements and bug-fixes.
> More than 90% of Ch
> Because, hum well, let's say I code for fun. And some mails with Mr
> Kirby were far from that. Moreover he asked on newsgroup if I was simply
> "wasting my time" adding some features.
> Really irritated, one hour later, I started Scid-pg.
> Regarding "vibrant effort", I did not check progress of
pgeorges wrote:
> Dr. David Kirkby a écrit :
>
>> Pascal do you have a Sourceforge ID number associated with your
>> request? I would like to make a formal objection. It seems I'm not the
>> only one to feel it is inappropriate.
>>
>>
>
> Who are you to decide for Shane Hudson or SF staff ?
Dr. David Kirkby a écrit :
> Pascal do you have a Sourceforge ID number associated with your request?
> I would like to make a formal objection. It seems I'm not the only one
> to feel it is inappropriate.
>
>
Who are you to decide for Shane Hudson or SF staff ? Who are you to
restrict someon
Pascal do you have a Sourceforge ID number associated with your request?
I would like to make a formal objection. It seems I'm not the only one
to feel it is inappropriate.
I feel Michal Rudolf's proposal, or links to the two projects is a good
one.
--
Jeremy White a écrit :
>> I agree, especially that there are two independent versions being developed.
>>
>
> I do not understand why there are two efforts underway.
>
> Specifically, Pascal, I do not understand why you have decided
> to start your own effort. As far as I can tell, Dr. Kirby
10 matches
Mail list logo
