Re: [Scid-users] No News is Good News

It is well known and accepted in the CC community that engines are used: http://amici.iccf.com/issues/issue_08/issue_08_ivar_bern_part_2.html https://www.iccf.com/Message.aspx?message=541 http://en.chessbase.com/post/better-than-an-engine-leonardo-ljubicic-2-2 HTH On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:56 P

Re: [Scid-users] missing option

Hi Fulvio. Why impossible? I thought Scid could access end game table bases? The format even provides distance to mate information for each position according to http://scid.sourceforge.net/tutorial/t_tool_egtb.html Or is this only through the chess engines? Nils (P.S. Thank you for your many,

Re: [Scid-users] engine auto-install

Who would have thought that a superb programmer like Fulvio is a fan of Steve Jobs, of Wozniak maybe, but not Steve Jobs... :) sorry about that :p On 11/27/2014 10:43 AM, Fulvio wrote: H.G. Muller wrote: There is a problem with that: if the format would be go to changes it would be for th

[Scid-users] Compiling in Yosemite OSX 10.10

I had some difficulties getting Scid to run after compiling it on Yosemite. Scid would crash immediately after startup without any error log. The solution was installing the latest ActiveTcl 8.6.2 binary from http://www.tcl.tk . Scid started right up afterwards without any

Re: [Scid-users] [Scidvspc-users] Window Docking feature

a CT-art 4. although they offer a very limited (3 I think) number of window placements. Cheers R. On 03/23/2013 02:02 PM, Steve A wrote: This feature seems to be working nicely now :) Quite exciting really. The PGN column mode really comes into it's own. Attached is a patch. I'll

Re: [Scid-users] Project merge

#x27;m just day-dreaming. Peace, R. -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu

Re: [Scid-users] Project merge

> But I think if we were to ask other readers of this list if anything > I've said thus far could be construed as filibustering, I would *really* > be surprised if just one agreed with you. I do agree with him. In my opinion, your posts has been among the least constructive, most dismissive of the

Re: [Scid-users] Project merge

Hi, I agree with Fulvio, I don't see any advantage in renaming scidvpc to scid and deleting scid. As it is we can decide between functional undocked scidvpc or the buggy docked scid. My 99 cents. Che

Re: [Scid-users] OSX 10.5.8 Startup issues with SCID

>> > > Heinz, are you using 10.5 or 10.6? I am using 10.6 Heinz -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find

Re: [Scid-users] OSX 10.5.8 Startup issues with SCID

to set windowsDock 0 There is a problem with the windows docking. Greetings, Heinz -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen

Re: [Scid-users] Scid should accept default choice of variation

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 02:00, Steven wrote: > > > Have you tried in Options->Moves to uncheck "Show > > variations window" and > > enable "Show Arrows for Variations"? > > Don't you like it? > > The arrows need to be made slightly wider, and with > canvas bindings to enter into each variation.

Re: [Scid-users] Scid should accept default choice of variation

Hi Mark. Long time. Hope you're fine. On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 23:01, Steven wrote: > Fulvio wrote: > > Mark Morss wrote: > > > When playing through a game with scid and the forward arrow takes you > to > > > more than one move, a "variations" popup box opens up with a list of > the > > > possib