Hi Alan,
I'm not sure if you realize this, but I think your many mails to this
list are mostly hurting rather than helping to make any kind of
progress.
I have not chimed in in a while because I believe everything has been
said, and there is nothing left to do but to wait and see how Fulvio
and S
Hi,
I think this thread is evidence that there is a strong desire from the
user base to revive the development of scid, and that there are people
who are interested to help out. Count me among those.
I guess it is also uncontroversial that having a larger development
community can only benefit the
Hi,
On 13 March 2013 15:42, Fulvio wrote:
> I'm sorry that you are experiencing so many crashes.
Since many people seem to have misunderstood me, let me clarify: I
don't have random crashes, but there is a specific bug that leads to a
segfault in my version of scid. If you do an "Open recent bas
ind regards,
Aljoscha
On 13 March 2013 11:13, Fulvio wrote:
> Aljoscha Lautenbach wrote:
>>
>> I am very much in favour of this merge.
>>
>>
>> Fulvio, for the people who have not been around as long, could you
>> name a reason why you are opposed to the merge?
Hi,
> > I strongly disagree with this.
> > You want to delete scid and rename your scidvspc.
> > I can't believe that Alexander agreed to this.
> > I'm very upset
> Ok, I can understand that feeling.
I must admit, as a new user who started to use Scid about half a year
ago and is using it almost
