Thanks.
SCID is a wonderful program: just about the most useful freeware on my
computer.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Ben St-Pierre wrote:
> Hello Fred,
>
> I've submitted the bug:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/scid/bugs/69/
>
> One day, I'll be able to fix this kind of issues, but for now
Hello Fred,
I've submitted the bug:
https://sourceforge.net/p/scid/bugs/69/
One day, I'll be able to fix this kind of issues, but for now I can barely
manage the clerical needs of the SCID project.
Thank you for your patience,
Ben
-
It seems to me that SCID should output the NAG, not a "D", which is not a
defined symbol in any source I can find. Thus the line should be:
7. Bxc6 Bxc6 $201
Not
7. Bxc6 Bxc6 D
To quote from http://www.thechessdrum.net/PGN_Reference.txt
-
I believe that scidvspc can host computer vs computer tournaments.
On 11/01/2014 07:06 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 02:31 +, jkex...@comcast.net wrote:
>> This is not a SCID question, but I am wondering...
>>
>> 1. Does anyone know if it is possible to restrict a chess eng
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 02:31 +, jkex...@comcast.net wrote:
> This is not a SCID question, but I am wondering...
>
> 1. Does anyone know if it is possible to restrict a chess engines
> analysis to white-only or black-only?
> 2. Does anyone know of a resource/webpage that lists the valid
> parame
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:51:40PM -0400, Fred Mellender wrote:
> UCI protocol: http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/UCIProtocol.html
>
> For what it is worth, I wrote a program that lets you pit one UCI engine
> against another. It is free, a Windows program, "Chess Speak", at
> https://sites.google.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:31:27AM +, jkex...@comcast.net wrote:
> This is not a SCID question, but I am wondering...
>
> 1. Does anyone know if it is possible to restrict a chess engines
> analysis to white-only or black-only? 2. Does anyone know of a
> resource/webpage that lists the valid
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:50:18AM +, jkex...@comcast.net wrote:
> I see in SCID's doc under "Standard NAG Values" value 201 = Diagram: D or #
Interesting. I see, according to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numeric_Annotation_Glyphs
that values 147 - 219 are not defined. As you can see, NAG 22
I've been meaning to report this as a bug for a long time: When I use SCID
to export an analyzed game (to pgn), with comments and variations, it
includes the "D", as in:
7. Bxc6 Bxc6 D
This is not valid pgn and fails accurate parsers. Either the D should be
enclosed in "{}", or deleted from t
