> SCID must be build-able using tools available in Debian!
It is. I'm using Scidvspc on Debian Sid, and it works just fine. I
dropped Scid in favor of Scidvspc because there are several features
that don't work properly in Scid. I submitted a patch but it has never
been included in Scid.
I hav
Scidvspc works perfectly well in any linux distro.
I use Slackware and Windows.
In Slackware is just as easy as:
./configure
./make
./make install
on the source tree, for both x86 or x64.
Differences? well, the 2 major differences:
.The docking mode doesn't work on scidvspc...
.Scidvspc supports
On 03/13/2013 10:15 AM, Grzegorz
Wierzchowski wrote:
I am using Scid on Windows (work), on Linux (netbook) and on Mac
(family) almost every day.
My Linux installation is up and running for more than a month, now.
I mainly search for, analyze, comment, and e
> I am using Scid on Windows (work), on Linux (netbook) and on Mac
> (family) almost every day.
> My Linux installation is up and running for more than a month, now.
> I mainly search for, analyze, comment, and export games.
> I don't have crashes.
>
> But this is irrelevant.
> What is happening n
Mario Lacunza wrote:
> yes I can...so?
>
> Saludos / Best regards
>
> Mario Lacunza
you have the latest version.
Bye,
Fulvio
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download Ap
yes I can...so?
Saludos / Best regards
Mario Lacunza
Email:: mlacu...@gmail.com
Personal Website:: http://www.lacunza.biz/
OpenOffice.org Perú:: http://openoffice-peru.com/
Hosting:: http://mlv-host.com/
Mascotas Perdidas:: http://mascotas-perdidas.com/
Google Talk / Y! messenger / Skype: mlacunz
You said you already have done "sudo apt-get install libx11-dev", right?
Yes. It said it was already installed.
find /usr -iname "libX11"
returned nothing. Hmmm
sudo apt-get install libx11-dev
[sudo] password for jai:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state in
Mario Lacunza wrote:
> I have 4.3 version in Ubuntu 12.10 64 bits...I think its the last one
> right?
>
>
As i said, i'm sorry, our fault, but having the 4.3 version doesn't mean
you have the last one.
Please open a database, open the tree window with CTRL+T, open the best
games window clicki
Jai Dayal wrote:
> Hi,
> I can never compile scid. I am on Ubuntu 12.10. I installed the
> tcl8.5-dev and tk8.5-dev; I have X11-dev installed as well. however
> when I configure scid I get
>
I don't have a linux machine at hand right now.
You said you already have done "sudo apt-get install
I have 4.3 version in Ubuntu 12.10 64 bits...I think its the last one
right?
Saludos / Best regards
Mario Lacunza
Email:: mlacu...@gmail.com
Personal Website:: http://www.lacunza.biz/
OpenOffice.org Perú:: http://openoffice-peru.com/
Hosting:: http://mlv-host.com/
Mascotas Perdidas:: http://mas
Oh okay. I thought the one in the repo wasn't the latest version?
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Mario Lacunza wrote:
> scid is in the repos, you dont need compile it.
>
> Saludos / Best regards
>
> Mario Lacunza
> Email:: mlacu...@gmail.com
> Personal Website:: http://www.lacunza.biz/
> Op
scid is in the repos, you dont need compile it.
Saludos / Best regards
Mario Lacunza
Email:: mlacu...@gmail.com
Personal Website:: http://www.lacunza.biz/
OpenOffice.org Perú:: http://openoffice-peru.com/
Hosting:: http://mlv-host.com/
Mascotas Perdidas:: http://mascotas-perdidas.com/
Google Tal
It's a 64bit machine, too.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Jai Dayal wrote:
> Hi,
> I can never compile scid. I am on Ubuntu 12.10. I installed the
> tcl8.5-dev and tk8.5-dev; I have X11-dev installed as well. however when I
> configure scid I get
>
> Renaming "Makefile" to "Makefile.bak"
Hi,
I can never compile scid. I am on Ubuntu 12.10. I installed the
tcl8.5-dev and tk8.5-dev; I have X11-dev installed as well. however when I
configure scid I get
Renaming "Makefile" to "Makefile.bak"
Tcl/Tk version: 8.5
Your operating system is: Linux 3.5.0-25-generic
Location o
I don't want to transform this in a sort of war between me and Steven.
I don't have anything against Steven and as far as i know he don't have
anything against me.
There is a lot of confusion about "scid bugs & crashes" and i would like
to clarify this:
you can get a very old version of scid if
I believe the idea of merging scidvspc into scid is an excellent
idea. I'm surprised that Fulvio does not appreciate the logic behind
Steve's move. In the end it is plain to see that this benefits
*everyone*.
Scid today works fine. But after comparing it with scidvsp
A blast from the past:
> So I will switch naming of my releases from scid-pg to scid as I have the
> right to.
http://www.mail-archive.com/scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00045.html
Sound familiar?
Yes, but let's forget about the personal.
-
Hello,
Please remove this page:
http://scid.sourceforge.net/dr_david_kirkby.html
This is irrelevant to the project.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Dow
Scid vs PC is a much more stable, active and bugs free project.
Scid is almost dead in itself
ScidDB doesn't even exist
All of the 3 projects share code, the main reason cause Free Software
fails to progress is lack of Community Work...
When people starts fighting about WHO is the leader.
> I'm a correspondence chess player and I use Scid about 1 to 2 hours
> per day to analyse my games, so I really care about usability and
> stability. But I do not really care too much how it is achieved, as
> long as it works. At the moment I spend quite some time every day
> working around the qu
Hi,
> This is wrong because now you can use either scidvspc or scid, your choice,
> after you can only use scidvspc.
In that case you are clearly seeing the two as completely separate
programs, which I must admit, I do not.
Freedom of choice is good, but it can also create confusion.
Let me tell
Hi,
I agree with Fulvio, I don't see any advantage in renaming scidvpc to
scid and deleting scid. As it is we can decide between functional
undocked scidvpc or the buggy docked scid.
My 99 cents.
Cheers
R.
--
Everyone
If Fulvio wants to take the lead, he should have the chance.
As far as I can see, Steven's another Pascal.
This can't be good.
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:18:48AM +0100, Fulvio wrote:
> I understand you don't have time for scid, but just let it be.
> Free software is about freedom, and even if it became a mess, people
> complains or argue, they should have the freedom to choose.
> Now they can choose between scid or scidvs
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 06:06:29PM +1000, Steve A wrote:
> I think we're going to merge the two Scids back into one.
As long as the original name is kept, sure.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing
Fulvio wrote:
> Yes, if Steven wants to merge back with scid (and i'm not sure of this)
> he should:
> - freeze the code of scidvspc
> - list the features he would like to port to scid
> - write patches for only that features and commit them to scid
> - state on scidvspc site that the project
Alexander Wagner wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 09:32 AM, Fulvio wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>>> Alexander has added me to the project. The plan is to move
>>> git master (scid/scid) to scid/scid-4.3-devel, and import
>>> Scidvspc svn as the new master (probably wont worry about
>>> the history).
>>>
>> I strongly di
Detlef Steuer wrote:
>>> Alexander has added me to the project. The plan is to move
>>> git master (scid/scid) to scid/scid-4.3-devel, and import
>>> Scidvspc svn as the new master (probably wont worry about
>>> the history).
>>>
>>>
>> I strongly disagree with this.
>> You want to delete
Aljoscha Lautenbach wrote:
> I am very much in favour of this merge.
>
>
> Fulvio, for the people who have not been around as long, could you
> name a reason why you are opposed to the merge? Do you have concrete
> plans to develop Scid further? There has been almost no activity in
> the last 2 yea
Hi,
> > I strongly disagree with this.
> > You want to delete scid and rename your scidvspc.
> > I can't believe that Alexander agreed to this.
> > I'm very upset
> Ok, I can understand that feeling.
I must admit, as a new user who started to use Scid about half a year
ago and is using it almost
> > Alexander has added me to the project. The plan is to move
> > git master (scid/scid) to scid/scid-4.3-devel, and import
> > Scidvspc svn as the new master (probably wont worry about
> > the history).
> >
> I strongly disagree with this.
> You want to delete scid and rename your scidvspc.
>
For those of us who have never used Scid vs PC, could you give a list of
differences between Scid and it?
(this time sent to the list...)
Remco
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Steve A wrote:
> I think we're going to merge the two Scids back into one.
>
> Scid is a little stagnant, what with
Steve A wrote:
> I think we're going to merge the two Scids back into one.
>
> Scid is a little stagnant, what with no active devs , no
> file releases for ages and bugs in Git. This way we'll have
> one bug free source tree, and one mailing list :)
>
> Alexander has added me to the project. The pl
Supported!
Marius
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Steve A wrote:
> I think we're going to merge the two Scids back into one.
>
> Scid is a little stagnant, what with no active devs , no
> file releases for ages and bugs in Git. This way we'll have
> one bug free source tree, and one mailing
I think we're going to merge the two Scids back into one.
Scid is a little stagnant, what with no active devs , no
file releases for ages and bugs in Git. This way we'll have
one bug free source tree, and one mailing list :)
Alexander has added me to the project. The plan is to move
git master (s
35 matches
Mail list logo
