Hmmm... my idea is interesting, but it needs some work.
And sometimes engines throw up misconceived Mate lines too:
5R1k/8/7B/4p2p/pq6/4N3/6R1/6K1 b - - 5 56
1 [+5.21] 56. ... Kh7 (0.00)
2 [M2] 56. ... Kh7 57. Rg7+ Kxh6 58. Nf5# (0.01)
2 [+11.79] 56. ... Qxf8 57. Bxf8 h4 58. Kh2 h3 59. Kxh
Fulvio wrote:
> Very interesting, i didn't suppose that the engine can output so many info
> that
>
> scid get stucked simply parsing it.
> However "update idletasks" don't solve the problem.
> The point is that fileevents have higher priority than idletasks, so "update
> idletasks" refresh
On 02/19/2011 09:56 PM, Steven wrote:
Hi,
> Joost't wrote:
>
>> Yes, I posted about these stockfish anomalies before.
>> And have some ideas in handling this; although I also hope that next sf
>> releases will somehow start to behave...
> Stockfish 191 was very bad. I just upgraded to 2.0.1 an
Joost't wrote:
> Yes, I posted about these stockfish anomalies before.
>
> And have some ideas in handling this; although I also hope that next sf
> releases will somehow start to behave...
Stockfish 191 was very bad. I just upgraded to 2.0.1 and it seems better
behaved.
The way it loads
On 02/19/2011 03:00 PM, f...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
>> Messaggio originale
>> Da: joost.t.h...@planet.nl
>> Data: 19/02/2011 13.37
>> A:
>> Ogg: Re: [Scid-users] I hate to wait [PATCH]
>>
>> On 02/19/2011 01:33 PM, f...@libero.it wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, I posted about these stockfish an
On 19/02/11 13:10, f...@libero.it wrote:
>
>
>> Messaggio originale
>> Da: jgarcia2...@telefonica.net
>> Data: 19/02/2011 10.46
>> A: "Scid Users List"
>> Ogg: [Scid-users] Time per move on analysis.
>>
>> Thanks very much for adding the possibility to set a match between
>> engines in
>Messaggio originale
>Da: joost.t.h...@planet.nl
>Data: 19/02/2011 13.37
>A:
>Ogg: Re: [Scid-users] I hate to wait [PATCH]
>
>On 02/19/2011 01:33 PM, f...@libero.it wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>Yes, I posted about these stockfish anomalies before.
>
>And have some ideas in handling this; although I
On 02/19/2011 01:33 PM, f...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
Yes, I posted about these stockfish anomalies before.
And have some ideas in handling this; although I also hope that next sf
releases will somehow start to behave...
Cheers,
Joost.
> Very interesting, i didn't suppose that the engine can outp
Very interesting, i didn't suppose that the engine can output so many info that
scid get stucked simply parsing it.
However "update idletasks" don't solve the problem.
The point is that fileevents have higher priority than idletasks, so "update
idletasks" refresh the GUI (not new user events) bu
>Messaggio originale
>Da: jgarcia2...@telefonica.net
>Data: 19/02/2011 10.46
>A: "Scid Users List"
>Ogg: [Scid-users] Time per move on analysis.
>
>Thanks very much for adding the possibility to set a match between
>engines in the Analysis Window.
>
>When selecting "Finish Game" on the A
>>
>
> Heinz, are you using 10.5 or 10.6?
I am using 10.6
Heinz
--
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more t
Thanks very much for adding the possibility to set a match between
engines in the Analysis Window.
When selecting "Finish Game" on the Analysis Window, the initial time
per move is hardcoded to 5 seconds. On succesive calls (stop engine,
restart it, select again "Finish Game") it reminds the se
Hmmm. I'm not so sure about the analysis changes and near mate positions -
the patch seems to perform worse than before.
Try this position
2Q1qk1r/2p5/8/8/8/6P1/6K1/5R2 b - - 0 5
, bring up stockfish and press "add move" till the end.
--
On Feb 19, 2011, at 1:02 AM, Heinz R. Hopfgartner wrote:
>
> Am 19.02.2011 um 05:17 schrieb Brian Kroll:
>
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I downloaded the latest version of SCID (4.3) from the site, installed it
>> on my MacBook, running OSX 10.5.8 and after installation launching SCID
>> several times each
14 matches
Mail list logo
