Thanks everyone for ironing out these bugs.
It's good to get alternative builds which show up these
dormant bugs.
S.
--
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate da
"Gerd Lorscheid" wrote:
> Hello,
>
>I did not care about %3 or anything else. I removed the variable
>ProbeCounts, which caused the overflow. It was used for debugging only.
>In a second step I cleaned the code from unused stuff not aware that
>there
>is an external tool scidlet using it. T
Hello,
I did not care about %3 or anything else. I removed the variable
ProbeCounts, which caused the overflow. It was used for debugging only.
In a second step I cleaned the code from unused stuff not aware that there
is an external tool scidlet using it. This is removed until scidlet is
On 01/03/2011 10:56 PM, Steven wrote:
Hi,
> Gerd,
>
> Have the recent changes fixed the PGN instability issue ?
Yes. They were caused by a (debug-only) buffer overflow in the
engine.cpp code.
> Joost wrote:
>> Yet what surprised me is that flag values> 3 really
>> could be
>> meaningless. Not
Gerd,
Have the recent changes fixed the PGN instability issue ?
Joost wrote:
> Yet what surprised me is that flag values > 3 really
> could be
> meaningless. Note that they are not taken into account in
> the switch
> statement to follow. Hence I wonder what is going on in the
> hash
> machin
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Alexander Wagner
wrote:
>
> The pragmatic way would be something like: Chris works in Zurich
> Candidats 1953. Checks the games, cleans data, and once he places a hook
> at Zurich 1953 this tournament is done. Fullstop. Next one... Unless
> someone spots an inconsis
On 01/03/11 18:18, Gerardo Fernandez wrote:
Hi!
> it fixes it... partially.
>
> When trying to search for the games matching my repertoire where one
> of the players is at least 2400:
>
> * it works if I do the repertoire search with 'Ignore (Reset filter)'
> and, after it, do the header search w
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Alexander Wagner
wrote:
> On 01/03/11 01:49, Gerardo Fernandez wrote:
>> applying a second filter to restrict a previous search doesn't seem to
>> work for me in Linux with current CVS version.
>
> Please try current cvs, I just committed Gerds fix some 10min ago.
>
On 01/03/2011 04:14 PM, Alexander Wagner wrote:
> On 01/03/11 15:56, Joost 't Hart wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
What do I do wrong?
>>>
>>> This works for me. Regardless of the syntax. I can happily search for
>>> 1600.00.00 - 1620.12.31
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> 1700.01.01 - 1790.12.31
>>
>> Funny. I get only g
On 01/03/11 15:56, Joost 't Hart wrote:
Hi!
>>> What do I do wrong?
>>
>> This works for me. Regardless of the syntax. I can happily search for
>> 1600.00.00 - 1620.12.31
>>
>> or
>>
>> 1700.01.01 - 1790.12.31
>
> Funny. I get only games that have at least a year and a month attached
> (a precisi
On 01/02/11 22:18, Benoit St-Pierre wrote:
Hi!
>> Do you mean the "Tools->Capture Current Board" feature ? It works fine for
>> me.. but requires the "TkImg" package for png support.
>
> Yes, I mean this feature. I do not think it comes with the compiled
> versions of Scid for Win and Mac.
Ups
On 01/03/2011 03:23 PM, Alexander Wagner wrote:
> On 01/03/11 15:07, Joost 't Hart wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> Im my base I have many (older) games with only a year indication (no
>> month/date).
>>
>> If I do a header search including.01.01 -.12.31 interval
>> for this year, such game is not included in t
On 01/02/11 19:52, Benoit St-Pierre wrote:
Hi!
> This project dates to the days me and Alex were arguing with Pascal
> for the need to add unique IDs to games.
Right.
> Pascal said that adding IDs to games would slow Scid too much.
He does not like the size the indexes might grow, right. But t
On 01/03/11 02:28, Esteban Cervetto wrote:
Hi!
> sorry boys, I dont understand the hint you are told me below. You are
> meant that I have to download scid 4.2.2 again and re-install it? Or is
> better stay in until the closing new version of SCID?
No, no, this refers to Steves Fork. He uses a
On 01/02/11 20:23, Steven wrote:
Hi!
>> Steve, does ScidvsPC sort all games in filter?
>
> Not sure what you mean, but i haven't added any extra sorting
> routines to the tree feature.
Not the tree. The games list. It can actually be sorted by the headings
of the new widget you introduced.
> I
On 01/03/11 01:49, Gerardo Fernandez wrote:
Hi!
> applying a second filter to restrict a previous search doesn't seem to
> work for me in Linux with current CVS version.
Please try current cvs, I just committed Gerds fix some 10min ago.
cu
Alexander
On 01/03/11 15:07, Joost 't Hart wrote:
Hi!
> Im my base I have many (older) games with only a year indication (no
> month/date).
>
> If I do a header search including.01.01 -.12.31 interval
> for this year, such game is not included in the filtered game list.
>
> What do I do wrong?
This works
Hi,
CVS, Linux/Windows
Im my base I have many (older) games with only a year indication (no
month/date).
If I do a header search including .01.01 - .12.31 interval
for this year, such game is not included in the filtered game list.
What do I do wrong?
Cheers,
Joost.
On 01/03/2011 01:49 AM, Gerardo Fernandez wrote:
> Hi, all,
Hi,
> applying a second filter to restrict a previous search doesn't seem to
> work for me in Linux with current CVS version.
I am afraid we are aware of this, yes. Quite some user functionality
involving filter operations has been suf
19 matches
Mail list logo
