> The last check-in was today, but the content is more or
> less only copied
> libraries. There is nothing the screenshots could be based
> on. So I guess we
> will see a lot of further delay announcements during the
> next years.
This person _is_ legit. I've written to Gregor quite a lot
and his
Hi,
have a look to:
http://scidb.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/scidb/
The last check-in was today, but the content is more or less only copied
libraries. There is nothing the screenshots could be based on. So I guess we
will see a lot of further delay announcements during the next years.
Chris Lott wrote:
> By happenstance I came across this Scid related project/fork whatever.
> Is anyone here involved with this project?
>
> http://scidb.sourceforge.net/
>
> The post that mentioned it was doing so in the context of scidb having
> support to read .cbh files...
>
>
And the screen
Steven wrote:
The arrows need to be made slightly wider, and with
canvas bindings to enter into each variation.
I'm not sure, but i think that tk doesn't support tha alpha
channel, so
you can't have transparent arrows like Chessbase's.
With many wider arrows i can imagine positions with
> > The arrows need to be made slightly wider, and with
> > canvas bindings to enter into each variation.
>
> I'm not sure, but i think that tk doesn't support tha alpha
> channel, so
> you can't have transparent arrows like Chessbase's.
> With many wider arrows i can imagine positions with most
Steven wrote:
> The arrows need to be made slightly wider, and with
> canvas bindings to enter into each variation.
>
>
I'm not sure, but i think that tk doesn't support tha alpha channel, so
you can't have transparent arrows like Chessbase's.
With many wider arrows i can imagine positions wit
