Re: [Scid-users] A database for Xiangqi?

2010-12-16 Thread M Winther
- Original Message - From: "Adrian Petrescu" To: "M Winther" Cc: Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 7:13 AM Subject: Re: [Scid-users] A database for Xiangqi? >I think being fond of programming and solving problems is a >necessary, but > not sufficient, condition. There are so many inter

Re: [Scid-users] A database for Xiangqi?

2010-12-16 Thread Adrian Petrescu
I think being fond of programming and solving problems is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition. There are so many interesting problems in the world to solve, why would anyone spend so much of their limited time creating something as intricate as Scid if they didn't have a special interest in

Re: [Scid-users] A database for Xiangqi?

2010-12-16 Thread M Winther
- Original Message - From: "Adrian Petrescu" To: Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 7:04 AM Subject: Re: [Scid-users] A database for Xiangqi? > Probably because the current effort is being made by chess fans, for > the > love of chess. If they don't care about Xiangqi, arguments about >

Re: [Scid-users] A database for Xiangqi?

2010-12-16 Thread M Winther
- Original Message - From: "Steven" To: "M Winther" Cc: "Scid Users List" Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 9:39 PM Subject: Re: [Scid-users] A database for Xiangqi? >> how difficult would it be to adapt Scid to Xiangqi? >Fairly impossible really. Just too much C and Tcl coded >for

Re: [Scid-users] Computer annotation issue

2010-12-16 Thread Joost 't Hart
On 12/16/2010 10:07 PM, Matthew Twomey wrote: Hi, > Ok, this still doesn't quite click for me - but I may still be > misunderstanding: > >> What we do now, is compare your scores of the position before 46.Ke6+ >> was played and after it was played. If the score-before is better (for >> white) tha

Re: [Scid-users] Computer annotation issue

2010-12-16 Thread Matthew Twomey
Ok, this still doesn't quite click for me - but I may still be misunderstanding: > What we do now, is compare your scores of the position before 46.Ke6+ > was played and after it was played. If the score-before is better (for > white) than the score-after then, depending on the score difference, >

Re: [Scid-users] Computer annotation issue

2010-12-16 Thread Matthew Twomey
Joost, Apologies for the slow reply here. I'm still digesting what you've said. Regarding the specific method of annotation, I think I get it now. The key, for me, was here: > > What we do now, is compare your scores of the position before 46.Ke6+ > > was played and after it was played. What I

Re: [Scid-users] A database for Xiangqi?

2010-12-16 Thread Steven
> how difficult would it be to adapt Scid to Xiangqi? Fairly impossible really. Just too much C and Tcl coded for an 8 by 8 board and standard chess. -- Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and le

Re: [Scid-users] Running SCID from a flash/removable drive?

2010-12-16 Thread Benoit St-Pierre
Yes, at least the last time I tried. -- pfff.ca -- Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social B

[Scid-users] Running SCID from a flash/removable drive?

2010-12-16 Thread Chris Lott
Can SCID be run from different machines using a flash or portable hard drive? c -- Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level,

[Scid-users] A database for Xiangqi?

2010-12-16 Thread M Winther
There exist many databases for chess, but not a single one for Xiangqi, Chinese Chess. I can understand that chess aficionados don't like to promote a competing game, but it's kind of absurd how much energy of developers goes into chess whereas very little is devoted to Xiangqi. After all, Xiangqi