On 11/26/2010 08:54 PM, Steven wrote:
Hi,
>>> After more testing, this part of the first line of
>> ::tree::refresh seems to be problematic:
>>>wm stackorder .
>>>
>>> If I place just that line at the beginning I get the
>> same message:
> Is there a reason here to use stackorder ?
> It shoul
> > After more testing, this part of the first line of
> ::tree::refresh seems to be problematic:
> >
> > wm stackorder .
> >
> > If I place just that line at the beginning I get the
> same message:
Is there a reason here to use stackorder ?
It should probably be removed if problematic on some
