On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Alexander Wagner <
a.wag...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote:
> At least for my part, yes. But you'll have to have some patience for me to
> get it done.
No problems there, this is more of a nice-to-have. A big nice-to-have, but I
don't exactly depend on it. I jus
IMHO, ND means you can't use it to create a modified product to use it
as a derivative work:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/
Unless you need to modify the product, it can be redistributed.
If that is a //sine qua non// condition, I could look for PNG under GPL.
--
Benoit St-Pierre wrote:
Hi!
> I am not a graphical designer. But I stumbled upon this site:
>
> http://www.defaulticon.com/
I fear most of our specials are not covered. And I'm not sure about real
1 bit. (I'm quite a purist, but well.) Additionally, they are CC-BY-ND,
I'm not sure how that r
Dale Hards wrote:
Hi!
> From the sounds of what's been said, am I right in assuming this is
> something that everyone's aware of and upgrading to skak properly will
> be a part of the proposed tex backend rewrite? I'd just like to know :)
At least for my part, yes. But you'll have to have som
