[Scid-users] configure script modification

2010-01-20 Thread Israel Chauca Fuentes
When I'm troubleshooting scid, some times I forget if I already copied Makefile.conf.darwin to Makefile.conf and I have to either copy the file or open the other to check. The attached patch would allow me to specify which config file to use passing its name as an argument. Nothing important, bu

Re: [Scid-users] Scid 4.2.2

2010-01-20 Thread Pascal Georges
2010/1/20 Israel Chauca Fuentes > Everything seems to work fine, Mac package available now at: > http://cachivaches.chauca.net/scid/ > > Attached is the patch for Makefile.conf.darwin. > > Thanks, patch commited. Pascal

Re: [Scid-users] Scid 4.2 on Windows problem

2010-01-20 Thread Pascal Georges
2010/1/20 j.f.r > W dniu 20-01-2010 16:15, Pascal Georges pisze: > > >>In version 4.2.1 does not work pgnscid.exe tool. Crashes to the desktop >>with a standard system error message (of course I run this program from >>the DOS window). In version 4.1 worked very well, without problems

[Scid-users] Scid 4.2.2

2010-01-20 Thread Israel Chauca Fuentes
Everything seems to work fine, Mac package available now at: http://cachivaches.chauca.net/scid/ Attached is the patch for Makefile.conf.darwin. Makefile.conf.darwin.patch Description: Binary data -- Throughout its 18-ye

Re: [Scid-users] Scid 4.2 on Windows problem

2010-01-20 Thread j.f.r
W dniu 20-01-2010 16:15, Pascal Georges pisze: > > In version 4.2.1 does not work pgnscid.exe tool. Crashes to the desktop > with a standard system error message (of course I run this program from > the DOS window). In version 4.1 worked very well, without problems. > > Compact Data

Re: [Scid-users] Scid 4.2 on Windows problem

2010-01-20 Thread Pascal Georges
2010/1/20 j.f.r > W dniu 20-01-2010 08:10, pa...@pbratholm.dk pisze: > > Hi > > I promptly upgraded from ver. 4.1 to ver. 4.2 and then discovered that at > > least some of my existing scid databases no longer were functional. > > > > I got somewhat nervous about it, and that did not get any bette

Re: [Scid-users] Scid 4.2 on Windows problem

2010-01-20 Thread j.f.r
W dniu 20-01-2010 08:10, pa...@pbratholm.dk pisze: > Hi > I promptly upgraded from ver. 4.1 to ver. 4.2 and then discovered that at > least some of my existing scid databases no longer were functional. > > I got somewhat nervous about it, and that did not get any better when I > maked a "rescue" ve

Re: [Scid-users] Scid 4.2 on Windows problem

2010-01-20 Thread Pascal Georges
This means the code I wrote for large file handling is not portable despite my efforts (I can't test all OS in 32 and 64 bit modes). So I reverted to old mode and made a maintenance release : Scid 4.2.2 which cannot handle files larger than 2 GB. Pascal 2010/1/20 > Hi > I promptly upgraded from

[Scid-users] Scid 4.2 on Windows problem

2010-01-20 Thread palle
Hi I promptly upgraded from ver. 4.1 to ver. 4.2 and then discovered that at least some of my existing scid databases no longer were functional. I got somewhat nervous about it, and that did not get any better when I maked a "rescue" version of one of the bases (I had at PGN version - so I created

Re: [Scid-users] Scid 4.2 build error

2010-01-20 Thread Pascal Georges
The problem is I did dot test those, and for portability of some 64 bits I/O calls I delegate the work to TCL (see rawFileSize). I don't know why the same code works with Scid and not on command line (I guess there are some initialisation stuff missing). For now the workaround is : use Scid, until