Re: [Scid-users] Show variation arrows

2009-11-30 Thread f...@libero.it
> > ? I don't understand. What I suggesed was to check if the > last ply before the variations is the same ply as within. > "if so, do not display the first ply of the var but the > second one". However, I do not know if this is at all easy > to do. It would be something like showing two plys of >

Re: [Scid-users] Show variation arrows

2009-11-30 Thread Alexander Wagner
Fulvio wrote: Hi! [...] > Yes. > The idea is to not reveal the next move when you reach a position > (sometimes you like to guess it by yourself). Ah. Ic. That's the idea of it. > But when you try to move forward the arrows displays to > warn you that there are multiple variations. Sure. My s

Re: [Scid-users] Show variation arrows

2009-11-30 Thread Fulvio
Alexander Wagner wrote: > Hi! > > First of all I think this is a useful new function, indeed. > Just tried it but I admit I'm a bit confused to how it > works. > > Say I have the following: > > 1. e4 e5 >(1... e6 ) >(1... d6 ) >(1... c5 ) > > I go to the beginning of the game, right, p

[Scid-users] Show variation arrows

2009-11-30 Thread Alexander Wagner
Hi! First of all I think this is a useful new function, indeed. Just tried it but I admit I'm a bit confused to how it works. Say I have the following: 1. e4 e5 (1... e6 ) (1... d6 ) (1... c5 ) I go to the beginning of the game, right, plays 1.e4. Shouldn't now the arrows appear? I

Re: [Scid-users] The comment vanishes

2009-11-30 Thread Fulvio
Joost 't Hart wrote: Fulvio wrote: Girolamo Castaldo wrote: This time, it's still there. In file main.tcl can you try to comment line 1271: if {[winfo exists .commentWin]} { .commentWin.cf.text delete 0.0 end } and see if it solves the original problem? Ju

Re: [Scid-users] The comment vanishes

2009-11-30 Thread Joost 't Hart
Fulvio wrote: > Girolamo Castaldo wrote: > >> This time, it's still there. >> >> >> > In file main.tcl can you try to comment line 1271: > if {[winfo exists .commentWin]} { .commentWin.cf.text delete 0.0 end } > > and see if it solves the original problem? > Just tried: the problem i

Re: [Scid-users] The comment vanishes

2009-11-30 Thread Girolamo Castaldo
I've downloaded the binary version, so I'm afraid I can't try that. Maybe someone else? -[ Received Mail Content ]-- Subject : Re: [Scid-users] The comment vanishes Date : Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:38:47 +0100 From : Fulvio To : Girolamo Castaldo Cc : scid-users@lists.so

Re: [Scid-users] The comment vanishes

2009-11-30 Thread Fulvio
Girolamo Castaldo wrote: > This time, it's still there. > > In file main.tcl can you try to comment line 1271: if {[winfo exists .commentWin]} { .commentWin.cf.text delete 0.0 end } and see if it solves the original problem? -

Re: [Scid-users] The comment vanishes

2009-11-30 Thread Girolamo Castaldo
This time, it's still there. -[ Received Mail Content ]-- Subject : Re: [Scid-users] The comment vanishes Date : Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:49:45 +0100 From : Fulvio To : Girolamo Castaldo Cc : scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net Girolamo Castaldo wrote: > Ok, let's go step

Re: [Scid-users] The comment vanishes

2009-11-30 Thread Cedric Mitel
If you close after store it is ok. - Original Message - From: "Fulvio" To: "Girolamo Castaldo" Cc: Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 7:49 PM Subject: Re: [Scid-users] The comment vanishes > Girolamo Castaldo wrote: >> Ok, let's go step by step. >> >> Case 1: >> 1) Create a new game an

Re: [Scid-users] The comment vanishes

2009-11-30 Thread Fulvio
Girolamo Castaldo wrote: > Ok, let's go step by step. > > Case 1: > 1) Create a new game and make a move (eg. 1.e4); > 2) Add a comment to it and store it; > 3) Make Black's move (eg. 1...c5); > 4) Go back to White's move (1.e4): the comment has disappeared. > Can you make a test? 1) Open the t

Re: [Scid-users] Some Suggestions

2009-11-30 Thread Philipp Enoeckl
I also can reproduce this bug. As mentioned, it only happens, when choosing "short header". No Engine loaded or any strange Annotation, just plain variations... Regards Philipp 2009/11/28, Pascal Georges : > 2009/11/28 Joost 't Hart > >> Pascal Georges wrote: >> > >> > >> > 2009/11/27 Robert Ry