> But instead of getting involved in pointless arguments with
> clone theory ... I decided to conduct some tests in order to
> introduce some facts into the discussion.
Do you care to mention what sort of testing you're
thinking of ??
My first impressions of RobboLito are that it's very fast an
The unresponsiveness only lasts a couple of seconds. If I set comparisons
for dumb engines that calculates at ply 100 when it knows it's a mate in 2,
this will slow down the analysis process in general.
Pascal
2009/11/13 Michal Rudolf
> I noticed that Scid becomes unresponsive for some engines
I noticed that Scid becomes unresponsive for some engines in near mate
positions like that:
6k1/ppr3p1/4QrBp/2B1p2P/2p5/Pq4P1/5P2/3R2K1 b - - 0 36
Some engines, like Stockfish, in such positions go as far as 100 ply (despite
this is a mate in 2), outputting line after line of analysis.
I guess
> From: Michal Rudolf
> I fail to see why people accept without any proof that
> somebody can just take the disassembled, unstructured code from a
> few engines (without any code and > documentation) and merge it,
> achieving a better performance.
Yes.. From a reverse engineering point of view,
