Re: [Scid-users] anyone have experience with Stockfish 1.5 or Thinker engines?

2009-10-10 Thread Oliver Korff
Am Samstag 10 Oktober 2009 00:12:55 schrieb andrei raevsky: > *Stockfish 1.5 (derivative of Glaurung) is now the undisputed king of the > open source engines. The Fruit family (e.g. Toga etc) has finally been > dethroned. Stockfish and Thinker are my two favorite practice partners -- > they both

Re: [Scid-users] couple of questions about databases

2009-10-10 Thread Pascal Georges
I repeated the process for the 5 PGN files without any problem. The only issue issue that could appear is a RAM shortage (I have 2 GB, and the resulting base eats 700 MB). Pascal 2009/10/10 Dale Hards > >Could you please detail the procedure to reproduce this ? What are exactly > >the bases you

Re: [Scid-users] couple of questions about databases

2009-10-10 Thread Dale Hards
>Could you please detail the procedure to reproduce this ? What are exactly >the bases you use, Scid's commands entered since its startup, etc. ? Even >some screenshots could help. I just tried opening up ICOFY PGN files and it >works for me. Running SCID 4.0 on Ubuntu 8.04 from source (make insta

Re: [Scid-users] anyone have experience with Stockfish 1.5 or Thinker engines?

2009-10-10 Thread Pascal Georges
Hi, Interesting, I was not aware of this. Stockfish 1.5 is based on Glaurung 2.1 so I will not be able to port it to Pocket Scid (threads + memory requirements). It has many options but not the ability to lower its level of play (ELO rating simulation). It works under Linux like any other UCI eng