Hi,
I've installed 3.7.3 for Mac with the Tcl bundle and I found that when
annotating a game with togaII if I check the "Mark tactical exercises" when one
is found scid hangs with a pop-up error with the following log:
This database is read-only; it cannot be altered.
This database is read-only;
2009/4/17 Alexander Wagner
>
> Hi!
>
>Still I do not understand why there is a checkbox "search in
>> reference base" as hooking it on and pointing to the current
>> base
>> gives exactly the same as not hooking it on. And as the
>> reference
>> base poin
Alexander Wagner, piątek, 17 kwietnia 2009:
>> In fact, I wonder if those are ever used properly or is it
>> used like both zugzwang symbols - there is only one symbol
>> and random NAG from 3*2 possible is used by annotators.
>At least those Informant games I have and checked use the
>NAGs in nu
Hi!
>Still I do not understand why there is a checkbox "search in
>reference base" as hooking it on and pointing to the current base
>gives exactly the same as not hooking it on. And as the reference
>base points to the current one anyway once the d
2009/4/17 Alexander Wagner
> Hi!
>
> Still I do not understand why there is a checkbox "search in
>>reference base" as hooking it on and pointing to the current base
>>gives exactly the same as not hooking it on. And as the reference
>>base points to the current one anyway once th
Hi!
> Still I do not understand why there is a checkbox "search in
> reference base" as hooking it on and pointing to the current base
> gives exactly the same as not hooking it on. And as the reference
> base points to the current one anyway once the dialogue opens up, I
> thi
Pascal Georges wrote:
Hi!
> I quickly checked under Windows XP, and NAG symbols seem to be
> correctly displayed.
Thanks. That seems good news :)
--
Kind regards,/ War is Peace.
|Freedom is Slavery.
Alexander Wagner
Michal Rudolf wrote:
Hi!
> Is interpreting $132 (White has moderate counterplay) as
> ⇄⇄ common?
I'm not sure about this, but how to distinguish them
properly otherwise?
> In fact, I wonder if those are ever used properly or is it
> used like both zugzwang symbols - there is only one symbol
> a
I quickly checked under Windows XP, and NAG symbols seem to be
correctly displayed.
Pascal
--
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200
