Thanks for your reply! Some additional comments in the text:
Alexander Wagner wrote:
> maroj...@netscape.net wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> 1. Adding comments in front of a move. This is very useful
>> for comments like "The idea is Ng3" of "Worse is Bb6
>> because of". Be aware that the same effect cannot b
scid-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:55:31 +0100
> From: Pascal Georges
> Subject: Re: [Scid-users] Problem with boardsize
> Cc: scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> 2009/3/22 J. Wesley Cle
Alexander Wagner, niedziela, 22 marca 2009:
>> Previously it was, so it is only the question of not
>> blocking all NAGs in GUI.
>Hm. Could try if that works.
Not a long time ago it was possible to enter variation, take first move back
and insert NAG. In fact, as only post-move NAGs were support
Michal Rudolf wrote:
Hi!
>>"->",// $40 White has the attack (DR: ->)
>>"->",// $41 Black has the attack (DR: ->)
>> Clearly, $40 is different from $41, how to express this
>> in symbols? (The problem is the same in UTF.) An idea
>> would be to pre/append a + for white a - for blac
Alexander Wagner, niedziela, 22 marca 2009:
>There is another open point. How to deal with these type of
>NAGS:
>"->",// $40 White has the attack (DR: ->)
>"->",// $41 Black has the attack (DR: ->)
>Clearly, $40 is different from $41, how to express this in
>symbols? (The problem i
Michal Rudolf wrote:
Hi!
[7-bit table]
> Many NAGs are present in most Unicode-enabled fonts,
Sure. All of them should actually exist, many of them being
well established symbols in math.
> including freely available corefonts. Maybe we can provide
> alternative version using these characters:
Alexander Wagner, niedziela, 22 marca 2009:
>maroj...@netscape.net wrote:
>
>Hi!
>
>> 2. Graphical annotation symbols. Maybe it's just me, but
>> I'm hopeless at remembering $22 or $23 or strings similar
>> to that. It doesn't compare to a zugzwang symbol. Although
>> I agree that in general using
maroj...@netscape.net wrote:
Hi!
> 2. Graphical annotation symbols. Maybe it's just me, but
> I'm hopeless at remembering $22 or $23 or strings similar
> to that. It doesn't compare to a zugzwang symbol. Although
> I agree that in general using text instead of annotation
> symbols is to be prefer
2009/3/22 J. Wesley Cleveland
> I can no longer change the size of the board. Options/chessboard/size is
> grayed out. This is on windows 2000. I tried changing boardSize in
> options.dat but the value in the file is reset to the value 50 immediately
> after starting scid.
>
>
If in docked mode a
