Garth Corral, czwartek, 22 maja 2008:
>I'm afraid Fink (or macports) isn't going to help with this particular
>mess and only serves to complicate the issue on OS X somewhat.
>
>Even if Fink would build tk 8.5 for you (there was no 8.5 listed when
>I checked), it will most likely build you an X11
On May 22, 2008, at 4:02 AM, Alexander Wagner wrote:
>
> Unfortunatley, I'm almost alone with the idea to use the
> enterprise versions as basis, though. (Where I think Debian
> stable is just a lower limit point everyone can meet
> easily. For me this is a good thing.) For this reason I
> think
On May 22, 2008, at 3:28 AM, Benoit St-Pierre wrote:
> I thought Fink was supposed to take care of this kind of mess. Is
> it not ?
>
I'm afraid Fink (or macports) isn't going to help with this particular
mess and only serves to complicate the issue on OS X somewhat.
Even if Fink would buil
2008/5/22 Michal Rudolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Garth Corral, czwartek, 22 maja 2008:
>
> >I don't think its an issue of one or the other. I can't speak to the
> >case of the options menu but I think there are at least as many
> >instances as not where cleaning up the UI would not add a step to t
Benoit St-Pierre wrote:
Hi!
> I thought Fink was supposed to take care of this kind of
> mess. Is it not ?
Fink cares about this, as any other decent packaging system.
If you build a binary, you'd add the proper version to the
requirements as "minimum". Say you build a scid binary for
Tcl/Tk
I thought Fink was supposed to take care of this kind of mess. Is it not ?
If not, how about releasing a stable version (with tk 8.4) and a development
one (with 8.5) ?
I would deem reworking 8.4 without using new 8.5 ineffective only if
reworking with 8.4 had not already been done.
Hi!
>> I don't think its an issue of one or the other. I can't
>> speak to the case of the options menu but I think there
>> are at least as many instances as not where cleaning up
>> the UI would not add a step to the migration to 8.5
>> because there would be no new widgets offered by 8.5
On May 22, 2008, at 1:01 AM, Michal Rudolf wrote:
> Garth Corral, czwartek, 22 maja 2008:
>
>> I don't think its an issue of one or the other. I can't speak to the
>> case of the options menu but I think there are at least as many
>> instances as not where cleaning up the UI would not add a ste
Garth Corral, czwartek, 22 maja 2008:
>I don't think its an issue of one or the other. I can't speak to the
>case of the options menu but I think there are at least as many
>instances as not where cleaning up the UI would not add a step to the
>migration to 8.5 because there would be no new widg
On May 22, 2008, at 12:21 AM, Pascal Georges wrote:
>
> > Cleaning this stuff up to make a consistent and more
> > standard UI would be effort better spent, and would not
> > preclude moving to a newer tk version later.
>
> I agree here.
>
> I don't. I prefer a single step : more time efficie
2008/5/22 Alexander Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just a thought here: IMHO it would greatly improve the
> usablity already if the settings menue is reworked to a
> dialog based interface that collects the various submenu
> items into single dialogs. I think e.g. about
> Options/Chessboard and all
11 matches
Mail list logo
