[Scid-users] PGN Import

2008-03-26 Thread Alexander Wagner
Hi! Just came accross this point: in CC support I've to import PGN files from scids Inbox directory. Now, if I set the language of scid say to German but import a PGN with english notation, I get an error (e.g. "Can't read move Sd7" for a Knight move Nd7). Switching the language to english gets th

Re: [Scid-users] 3.6.23 RC2

2008-03-26 Thread Alexander Wagner
WilSoft wrote: Hi! >> For the status: I want to finish the CC stuff first, and I'd >> not delay 3.6.23 for Input Engine. But it's on my definite >> list for 3.6.24 the latest. This does not mean that whats >> there already is unusable, but Scids support for Input >> Eninges definitely needs

Re: [Scid-users] 3.6.23 RC2

2008-03-26 Thread WilSoft
Hi > On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Alexander Wagner wrote: > Its not perfectly polished yet as the Correspondence Chess > part took more time than I expected (well this part right > now offers much more functionality than I first intended ;) > but it will get polished as soon as I've the time. > > F

Re: [Scid-users] Extended NAG values

2008-03-26 Thread Alexander Wagner
Hi! >>... >> Then everybody could get what (s)he wants, and it would be easily >> expandable to other output formats like html, xml, etc. >> >> Pascal what do you think about this approach? >> > I have no valuable advice in that field : I never really used LaTeX, and > I have no inter

Re: [Scid-users] Extended NAG values

2008-03-26 Thread pgeorges
Alexander Wagner a écrit : > > > > I think thats not a big problem to solve.. As I can see > > the code is clean and it should be easily integrated (well > > .. I think it should). One thing crossed my mind. Does > > modifying the tex-code output interact with the HTML > > output? I havent d

Re: [Scid-users] Extended NAG values

2008-03-26 Thread pgeorges
Ulrich Dirr a écrit : > Hi, > > On Wednesday, March 26, 2008 7:34 AM Alexander Wagner wrote: > >> > which tex system are you using? You should also use the >> > most recent packages. I would strongly recommend using >> > skak with chessfs/chessboard or texmate. There are several >> > documen

Re: [Scid-users] Extended NAG values

2008-03-26 Thread Alexander Wagner
WilSoft schrieb: Hi! >> Thats good news, so you want to get the current 3.6.xx >> line to Debian? (This is especially of interest as it >> will also move on to the spin-off distributions.) > > I am building the package 3.6.22 for debian. But for now I > dont have the formal debian-maintaine

Re: [Scid-users] Extended NAG values

2008-03-26 Thread Ulrich Dirr
Hi, On Wednesday, March 26, 2008 10:02 AM Alexander Wagner wrote: [...] > > Much more important would be how we can configure scid to > > write the code we want. > > Perfectly agree. With a probably not optimal but simple, > good stlye usable without deep knowledg of LaTeX' internals. > That

Re: [Scid-users] Extended NAG values

2008-03-26 Thread WilSoft
On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Alexander Wagner wrote: > Hi! > > >>> If you're at the bleeding edge, you'll have to package the > >>> styles and stuff with scid (which I consider a major design > >>> fault) plus people will most likely not know how to use > > [...] > > >>> enable it would probably

Re: [Scid-users] Extended NAG values

2008-03-26 Thread Alexander Wagner
Hi! >>> If you're at the bleeding edge, you'll have to package the >>> styles and stuff with scid (which I consider a major design >>> fault) plus people will most likely not know how to use [...] >>> enable it would probably be good, or the config file you >>> mentioned. (Though this will i

Re: [Scid-users] Extended NAG values

2008-03-26 Thread WilSoft
On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Alexander Wagner wrote: > > Sorry to hook in here again: if you even go beyond "Debian > > Testing" you'll get to areas where nearly no distribution > > will just deliver it, don't speak of the world beyond > > Linux... > > > > I don't even know of a distribution that co

Re: [Scid-users] {Spam?} Re: Extended NAG values

2008-03-26 Thread Alexander Wagner
Ulrich Dirr schrieb: > On Wednesday, March 26, 2008 9:28 AM Willem van den Akker > wrote: >> I am using skak-1.2 which is the current version >> distributed with debian-testing. Chessfss is currently >> not included in the debian-testing distribution so it >> must be packaged (if no copyright

Re: [Scid-users] Extended NAG values

2008-03-26 Thread Alexander Wagner
Ulrich Dirr schrieb: Hi! > TeXLive 2005 would be definitely the wrong distribution as skak, > chessfs/chessboard and texmate2 got serious improvements after this > release. TeXLive 2007 is o.k. Well, ok. Then 2007. But I strongly encourage to keep away quite a bit from the bleeding edges. I

Re: [Scid-users] {Spam?} Re: Extended NAG values

2008-03-26 Thread Ulrich Dirr
On Wednesday, March 26, 2008 9:28 AM Willem van den Akker wrote: > I am using skak-1.2 which is the current version distributed with > debian-testing. Chessfss is currently not included in the > debian-testing distribution so it must be packaged (if no copyright > issues are involved). Where can I

Re: [Scid-users] Extended NAG values

2008-03-26 Thread Ulrich Dirr
Hi, On Wednesday, March 26, 2008 7:34 AM Alexander Wagner wrote: > > which tex system are you using? You should also use the > > most recent packages. I would strongly recommend using > > skak with chessfs/chessboard or texmate. There are several > > documents which are explaining everything v

[Scid-users] {Spam?} Re: Extended NAG values

2008-03-26 Thread WilSoft
> > which tex system are you using? You should also use the > > most recent packages. I would strongly recommend using > > skak with chessfs/chessboard or texmate. There are several > > documents which are explaining everything very detailed. > > I'd actually NOT suggest to use really the latest an