Hi!
> On Tuesday, March 25, 2008 4:08 PM WilSoft wrote:
>> I have played somewhat with the skak package.
>>
>> I like the way the diagrams are handled and can be
>> scaled. Also the fonts are much better. However I saw
>> few drawbacks. I cant tell if its not possible or I
>> couldnt find
Hi,
On Tuesday, March 25, 2008 4:08 PM WilSoft wrote:
> I have played somewhat with the skak package.
>
> I like the way the diagrams are handled and can be scaled. Also the
> fonts are much better.
> However I saw few drawbacks. I cant tell if its not possible or I
> couldnt find it.. ;). The u
I have played somewhat with the skak package.
I like the way the diagrams are handled and can be scaled. Also the fonts
are much better.
However I saw few drawbacks. I cant tell if its not possible or I couldnt
find it.. ;). The use of Informator symbols in Skak are badly documented...
- T
I have played somewhat with the skak package.
I like the way the diagrams are handled and can be scaled. Also the fonts are
much better.
However I saw few drawbacks. I cant tell if its not possible or I couldnt
find it.. ;). The use of Informator symbols in Skak are badly documented...
-
WilSoft wrote:
Hi!
> 3.6.23 now supports the DGT-board :)
Well, sure ;)
Not only DGT though, its a more general interface, actually.
> Well I think it does...
It does. Its not just the buttons I can asure you. ;)
> Under 'Connect hardware' a engine driver dgtdrv2.i686 is
> given (Commman
Hi,
3.6.23 now supports the DGT-board :). Well I think it does...
Under 'Connect hardware' a engine driver dgtdrv2.i686 is given
(Commmand is written with 3 m's in the menu..).
Has anybody tested it?
The driver can be found here... http://dgtdrv.sourceforge.net/
gr,
Willem
--
This message has
WilSoft wrote:
Hi!
> I have looked to the Skak package. Its very complete. It
> has also a impact on the code which much be generated. But
> the result is nice.. ;), nice diagram.
Definitly one should bring scids LaTeX to this century, and
Skak is a good package. Used it sometimes in the past