Re: [Scid-users] List archive and other things

2008-03-08 Thread Henk van Lingen
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 12:15:59PM +0100, Henk van Lingen wrote: > > About databases, chessdb provides a so called huge database. I suppose > this also works with scid(pg). Does someone provide this in tarball form? > > Are there other large databases? Answering part of my own question: I found

[Scid-users] List archive and other things

2008-03-08 Thread Henk van Lingen
Hi, (new here) The list archive seems to be inaccessible. Is this due to the scid-pg vs. chessdb controverse (i've read through that stuff yesterday)? Is there another archive? (is it known whether Shane is still alive?) About databases, chessdb provides a so called huge database. I suppose thi

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-08 Thread Pascal Georges
2008/3/8, Alexander Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Actually here I like the notion that it was just a bug in your brain and > you got the wrong package installed. I'll add a suitable error message > of course. > > I'm polishing the interface right now (you might have noticed in cvs) > hence there

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-08 Thread Alexander Wagner
pgeorges wrote: Hi! > This is not a bug in Suse's packages, but one of my brain :-[ > > I installed latest Opensuse 10.3 and noticed there is a tdom package on > the DVD that is sufficient to install and now "package require tdom" > works well. I think the package naming would having been clea

Re: [Scid-users] CBF support for Scid?

2008-03-08 Thread Alexander Wagner
Gilbert Rebhan wrote: Hi! >> The universal chess format already exists : PGN. And Scid and chessbase >> (and nearly every chess software I am aware of, can import / export this >> PGN format). > > yes of course, but what if you get a cbf | cbh file and > you don't own a chessbase product l

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-08 Thread pgeorges
Alexander Wagner a écrit : > pgeorges wrote: > > Hi! > > >> This is a stable SuSE? Or some of this Open-Ever-Beta > >> stuff? That is: could it just be a bug in SuSE? Probably > >> solved by some of their updates? > >> > > I use SLED 10.1, supported by Suse. I also checked on Windows > > (ActiveSta

Re: [Scid-users] Xfcc for the impatient

2008-03-08 Thread Alexander Wagner
pgeorges wrote: Hi! >> This is a stable SuSE? Or some of this Open-Ever-Beta >> stuff? That is: could it just be a bug in SuSE? Probably >> solved by some of their updates? >> > I use SLED 10.1, supported by Suse. I also checked on Windows > (ActiveState Tcl) and tdom is present. So it is