[Scid-users] RC3

2007-10-30 Thread pgeorges
Hi, I uploaded a rc3 of Scid 3.6.19 (with a windows setup). Note that, at last, all up to date Scid for Pocket code is here (but I am sure I am the only person able to compile this mess). Regarding Scid for Pocket I am very close to 1.0, and I personaly use it every day to train openings. It is

Re: [Scid-users] [Fwd: Re: revisiting the issue of abandoned Scid]

2007-10-30 Thread pgeorges
Alexander Wagner a écrit : > Hi! > > First of all I did not manage to subscribe for this list for > whatever reason till now (was always refused or did not get > any answers from the listrobot but now it seems to work) so > I was not able to follow the discussion (still I've not > found a way to ac

Re: [Scid-users] [Fwd: Re: revisiting the issue of abandoned Scid]

2007-10-30 Thread Marcin Kasperski
> First of all I did not manage to subscribe for this list for > whatever reason till now (was always refused or did not get > any answers from the listrobot but now it seems to work) so > I was not able to follow the discussion (still I've not > found a way to access the archives )... For about a

[Scid-users] [Fwd: Re: revisiting the issue of abandoned Scid]

2007-10-30 Thread Alexander Wagner
Hi! First of all I did not manage to subscribe for this list for whatever reason till now (was always refused or did not get any answers from the listrobot but now it seems to work) so I was not able to follow the discussion (still I've not found a way to access the archives )... >>> Excuse me fo

Re: [Scid-users] revisiting the issue of abandoned Scid

2007-10-30 Thread Ejner Borgbjerg
On 10/28/07, pgeorges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ejner Borgbjerg a écrit : > > Excuse me for asking a curious - but for sure a naive - question. I > > did not follow this discussion previously ! > > What is the problem with making a fork of Scid and have that fork > > hosted by SF ? Wouldn't that