Selon "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As you are aware Pascal submitted an application to gain control of Scid.
Gain control would mean I wanted to "steal" (or something like that) Scid. That
was far from being my intention. I wish someone else had done it.
Kirkby can be glad, he nearly
Dr. David Kirkby, środa, 14 lutego 2007:
>Does Michal have access and feel comfortable about making such a change?
>That would be better.
Unfortunately I don't have access to Scid site. But there are two admins apart
from Shane, so the easiest will be to ask one of them.
--
Michal Rudolf
-
As you are aware Pascal submitted an application to gain control of Scid.
I objected to this to Sourceforge:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1658454&group_id=1&atid=21
and have received this back:
"I have marked the takeover request as denied (at least for now), and
Hi,
I released a new version at
http://prolinux.free.fr/scid/
The main change is visible on the 2 last screenshots at
http://prolinux.free.fr/scid/scid_newfeatures.html#annotate_blunders
(a game is annotated using a selectable opening book : the "analysis" is
of course more accurate and takes far
Hi,
What you're asking for is certainly feasible, but only in 2D for me ! I
remember diagrams in Paul Keres' book on endgames and I helped (a very
little bit) Hiarcs'author in the way Hiarcs handled endings because such
diagrams are not that easy to code in a program.
I personaly could never ta
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 10:33 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose someone continues Scid (a supposition, keep trolls at
> leash).
> Let's try to be objective, leave testosterone aside and be
> analytical :
[snipped]
> 1.2 Shane comes back
> 1.2.1 Shane disagrees with any modifs
I think current situation can be described as below: we have two people
seriously willing to spend their time developing and enhancing Scid. On the
other hand, it is clear that both find hard to work together. While I can
understand calls for peace, I am a bit skeptical about them. If you spend
Hi list,
* On 2007-02-13 Sean O'Donovan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [...]
> As a low-activity member of this list (ie "lurker"), I would request
> that Pascal and David do their best to sort out their differences. Each
> has contributed greatly to Scid.
> [...]
as another "lurker" I just want to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> If I had continued with chessDB I would not have been able to work at this
> pace
> and having fun doing it.
>
OK, at least I tried. I wish you to have fun developping Scid-pg.
Personaly, I will try as much as possible to contribute to ChessDB in
which I trust. I
Selon Jean-Renaud Seret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Bonjour,
> I recognize you developped interesting and powerful features inside the
> so called Scid-pg. That you released patches, plugins or full releases
> is not the point. You are working in a solo mode, and that is the wrong
> way. That's what my
Hi,
Suppose someone continues Scid (a supposition, keep trolls at leash).
Let's try to be objective, leave testosterone aside and be analytical :
1. Someone continues Scid :
-
1.1 Shane never surfaces again -> Scid stays alive : WIN !
1.2 Shane comes back
1.2.1 Sha
pgeorges a écrit :
> If you want to continue Scid development : go ahead, ask for a take over
> at SF, this will be less burden for me.
>
> If you want to take benefits from others code (put your name in so many
> files where you did not change anything), then continue ChessDB.
>
> I wish we coul
Hi all,
I would like to go along with Sean.
Thanks to all of you who put in so much labour to make
Scid/Scid-pg/ChessDB so useful for the rest of us. Please settle your
differences amicably. Perhaps you are fighting over some point which
may not be worth losing your peace for.
Or perhaps you are
13 matches
Mail list logo
