Re: (was: xfs problems) Now: partitioning question

2000-11-26 Thread brian davison
You said you had ONE linux partition and swap didn't you? Two are showing... that's where the extra space is. brian ** At 11:08 AM 11/24/00 -0700, you wrote: >Is this what you needed? > > >Eric Cifreo wrote: > >> Send the output of "df -k" > >Filesystem

Re: (was: xfs problems)

2000-11-24 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Larry Grover wrote: > > To find out where your missing HD space is, run "fdisk", or better "cfdisk". It >will show you how your HD is partitioned. You should be able to figure out if you've >got a patition that isn't mounted, or if you have free space which you forgot to

Re: (was: xfs problems) Now: partitioning question

2000-11-24 Thread Michael Lewis
Is this what you needed? Eric Cifreo wrote: > Send the output of "df -k" Filesystem 1k-blocksUsed Available Use% Mounted 0n /dev/hda 1492311 1391559 23642 98% / and the printout of partitions from "fdisk > /dev/hda" back. Device Boo

Re: (was: xfs problems)

2000-11-24 Thread Larry Grover
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 03:32:11 -0700, Michael Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > more needed space. Also, is it possible that when we did the initial > installation, we created a partion, but for some reason we didn't give > it a proper mount point so it's just not showing up? To find out where y

Re: (was: xfs problems)

2000-11-24 Thread Eric Cifreo
> Hello Everyone, > > I just wanted to update you on my problem. My system is still working > fine and I'm still trying to free up some additional disk space. I have > removed a couple of programs I tried, but didn't really like, and I'm > compressing some other programs that I probably won't u

Re: (was: xfs problems)

2000-11-24 Thread Michael Lewis
Hello Everyone, I just wanted to update you on my problem. My system is still working fine and I'm still trying to free up some additional disk space. I have removed a couple of programs I tried, but didn't really like, and I'm compressing some other programs that I probably won't use for a whi

Re: xfs problems

2000-11-23 Thread Jack Bowling
** Reply to message from Steve Borho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 23 Nov 2000 16:09:26 -0600 > On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 09:49:53AM -0800, Jack Bowling wrote: > > Yep, happens here too. "rm -rf ./netscape/cache *" is a frequent > > incantation on my box. > > I hope that's a typo :^) LOLOLOLOL

Re: xfs problems

2000-11-23 Thread Statux
heh.. me too ;) The "rm -rf ./netscape/cache *" that is. ^ This space can | cause problems :) On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Steve Borho wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 09:49:53AM -0800, Jack Bowling wrote: > > Yep, happens here too. "rm -rf ./net

Re: xfs problems

2000-11-23 Thread Steve Borho
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 09:49:53AM -0800, Jack Bowling wrote: > Yep, happens here too. "rm -rf ./netscape/cache *" is a frequent > incantation on my box. I hope that's a typo :^) -- Steve Borho Voice: 314-439-8342 Member of Technical Staff Celox Networks Inc

Re: xfs problems

2000-11-23 Thread Jack Bowling
** Reply to message from Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 23 Nov 2000 17:30:04 +0100 (CET) > On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Thomas Ribbrock wrote: > > [ ... ] > > > > So, to be able to help you further, I need to know at the very minimum > > the output of "df" as well as the output of "du -

Netscape cache (was: xfs problems)

2000-11-23 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 05:30:04PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > Thanks to your discussion I just realized that Netscape, as it seems to > me, doesen't delete its disk-cache, even if I told him in the > 'preferences' (browser menu) to 'Clear Disk Cache': [...] That's a well known problem,

Re: Was (Re: xfs problems) Now FIXED!!!!

2000-11-23 Thread Michael Lewis
>If core files are a problem, you can turn that off. Most people don't >really need this since it is debugging feature. Just comment out the >'ulimit' line in /etc/profile. HTH > >PS -- Your clock is still off: Nov 09, 2000 at 09:17:17AM -0700 I commented it out and changed my clock;-) Thanks!

RE: Was (Re: xfs problems) Now FIXED!!!!

2000-11-23 Thread Uncle Meat
On 09-Nov-2000 Michael Lewis opined: > Thanks to Thomas and Michele and Hal for all of your input. I learned > more > tonight about my system than in the last six months. I just started > cleaning out some old files and found some more core files in my user > directory and that did the trick

Re: Was (Re: xfs problems) Now FIXED!!!!

2000-11-23 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 09:17:17AM -0700, Michael Lewis wrote: > Thanks to Thomas and Michele and Hal for all of your input. I learned more > tonight about my system than in the last six months. I just started > cleaning out some old files and found some more core files in my user > directory

Re: xfs problems

2000-11-23 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Thomas Ribbrock wrote: [ ... ] > > So, to be able to help you further, I need to know at the very minimum > the output of "df" as well as the output of "du -s /tmp" and > "du -s /var/tmp". The last two will tell how much space those two > directories use. > Thanks to your

Re: xfs problems

2000-11-23 Thread Michael Lewis
This was right. That's exactly what I did. I did learn something tonight after all;-) >No, wait a minute - when the crash happened, were you logged into the >personal login? In that case, a prime suspect is your home directory >(didn't think of that - on all my machines that's a separate >par

Was (Re: xfs problems) Now FIXED!!!!

2000-11-23 Thread Michael Lewis
Thanks to Thomas and Michele and Hal for all of your input. I learned more tonight about my system than in the last six months. I just started cleaning out some old files and found some more core files in my user directory and that did the trick. I think I will keep checking my home directo

Re: xfs problems

2000-11-23 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 07:53:39AM -0700, Michael Lewis wrote: > Sorry, I forgot the disk usage: > > Filesystem1k-blocks Used availableUse% Mounted on > /dev/hda6 1492311 14167970100% / > /dev/hdc556054 5560540100%

Re: xfs problems

2000-11-23 Thread Michael Lewis
Sorry, I forgot the disk usage: Filesystem 1k-blocksUsed available Use%Mounted on /dev/hda6 1492311 1416797 0 100%/ /dev/hdc 556054 556054 0 100%/mnt Thats what It said before I r

Re: xfs problems

2000-11-23 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:52:37AM -0700, Michael Lewis wrote: > Output of ls -l is: [...] Oh, you meant your home directory, not "root"? Just to clarify some terms: The directory your own stuff is in is your home directory, to which some people also refer as $HOME (because the environment varia

Re: xfs problems

2000-11-23 Thread Michael Lewis
Output of ls -l is: total 5 drwx-- 5 root root 1024 Oct 161999 Desktop drwx-- 2 root root 1024 Oct 101999 Mail -rw---1 root root 840 Oct 121999 PPP-logfile drwx-- 2 root root 1024 Oct 121999 nsmail -rw-r

Re: xfs problems

2000-11-23 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 05:45:15AM -0700, Michael Lewis wrote: > Okay, I removed a whole bunch of kfm and kio files from /tmp, probably > created by the K Font Manager I mentioned earlier and just a couple of > others from /var/tmp. I have 2.5 gig of core files on the root > directory, but

Re: xfs problems

2000-11-23 Thread Michael Lewis
Okay, I removed a whole bunch of kfm and kio files from /tmp, probably created by the K Font Manager I mentioned earlier and just a couple of others from /var/tmp. I have 2.5 gig of core files on the root directory, but not under /tmp or /var/tmp should I get rid of those too? Thanks so

Re: xfs problems

2000-11-23 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 04:52:57AM -0700, Michael Lewis wrote: > When I run: rpm -ivh XFree86-xfs-3.3.3.1-49.i386.rpm I get an error: > installing package XFree86-xfs-3.3.3.1-49.i386.rpm needs 514K on the > filesystem. Ah - NOW we're talking! Well, that error message is pretty plain: Your fi

Re: xfs problems (was: Is there another list?)

2000-11-23 Thread Michael Lewis
>I also ran "rpm -qil XFree86-xfs" and it said it was not installed. I >had already gone into the init.d directory and looked for it and it wasn't >there. Michael Lewis Exasource Inc. 3307 S College Suite 336 Ft. Collins, CO. 80525 Main: 970-206-4554 Direct: 970-206-4556 Fax: 970-282-057

Re: xfs problems (was: Is there another list?)

2000-11-23 Thread Michael Lewis
When I run: rpm -ivh XFree86-xfs-3.3.3.1-49.i386.rpm I get an error: installing package XFree86-xfs-3.3.3.1-49.i386.rpm needs 514K on the filesystem. Michael Lewis Exasource Inc. 3307 S College Suite 336 Ft. Collins, CO. 80525 Main: 970-206-4554 Direct: 970-206-4556 Fax: 970-282-0572 Cell

xfs problems (was: Is there another list?)

2000-11-23 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 03:45:28AM -0700, Michael Lewis wrote: > > > > I then ran ntsysv and xfs was checked off. > > I ran ntsysv again and xfs is no longer an option. And yes, I tried to do > a startx and xinit but it failed again. On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 04:03:11AM -0700, Michael Lewis wr