The flash cards are likely formatted fat32 (vfat)
mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/MOUNTPOINT should automatically pick the fs type
for you. If not, add a -tvfat to the mount command.
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 11:01, Sachintha Karunaratne wrote:
> hi,
> i recently bought a usb flash drive.
> i wa
Ben Hall wrote:
The flash cards are likely formatted fat32 (vfat)
Just to interject - they are usually NOT FAT32, rather FAT12 - some are
FAT16 but I've never seen a FAT32 one.
Reason being that their capacities are SO SMALL, that FAT16 or FAT32 are
way too wastefull on overhead.
FAT12 is
hi,
i recently bought a usb flash drive.
i want to use it under linux.
can somebody tell me the
type of the file system that i should
use when mounting it.
thanks
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:19:22AM -0400, Ben Hall wrote:
> The flash cards are likely formatted fat32 (vfat)
>
> mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/MOUNTPOINT should automatically pick the fs type
> for you. If not, add a -tvfat to the mount command.
Though, if you plan on using it only on linux, you can put
Toralf Lund wrote:
Please refer to the below Q & A from the USB FAQ. One of our customers
is seeing this behaviour right now. The weird bit is that the setup has
worked in the past, and as far as I know, the hardware or BIOS (or OS
installation) haven't changed at all. Any ideas what might caus
Toralf Lund wrote:
Please refer to the below Q & A from the USB FAQ. One of our customers
is seeing this behaviour right now. The weird bit is that the setup has
worked in the past, and as far as I know, the hardware or BIOS (or OS
installation) haven't changed at all. Any ideas what might caus
Please refer to the below Q & A from the USB FAQ. One of our customers
is seeing this behaviour right now. The weird bit is that the setup has
worked in the past, and as far as I know, the hardware or BIOS (or OS
installation) haven't changed at all. Any ideas what might cause this
problem to s
