. g. quinn
starving programmer
living is about making mistakes
dying is about wishing you'd made more
- Original Message -
> I am glad to see discussion about system security because I am just
> considering to build a small LAN.
> Currently, I use a DSL connection with a SMC B
Ok, thx for the info. I'm looking forward to it tomorrow. I've had dialup
here in the desert that gives me an average download of 1.5 k/s. Sick. So,
even 20k will be one hell of a mark up. Sounds like it will be fine. Thx.
Jim.
On Tue, 7 May 2002 09:50:03 -0500
Billy R Nordyke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have them connected with ethernet cards and a hub also. On the fast
computers they are netgear cards. Don't have the model right handy. On
the 486 it's a generic 16 bit card. That really doesn't seem to make
much difference. It does seem that keeping the activity on the computer
connect
I was concerned about the secondary connections at 20k. How do you have
them connected? I will have mine connected with ethernet cards and a hub,
will that help any? The primary computer will be a dell laptop with xp
loaded.
Is it stable?
Jim.
On Tue, 7 May 2002 09:25:19 -0500
Billy R Nordyke
Hi,
I've been using Pegasus Direct satellite internet for a few months now.
As far as I know it doesn't support linux either. I have 3 computers
networked together and receive the satellite transmissions on one with an
AMD Athlon 1.4G processor. The others, one similar to the first dual
boots t
** Reply to message from julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 06 May 2002
21:06:45 -0700
> I never had to consider security issues before, therefore I would also
> appreciate if you could point me to some good tutorials.
Oskar Andreasson has gone to a lot of work just for you, Julius. Check out
)
Werner Puschitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 May 2002, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> > julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I am glad to see discussion about system security because I am just
> > >
> > > considering t
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Harry Putnam wrote:
> julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am glad to see discussion about system security because I am just
> > considering to build a small LAN.
> > Currently, I use a DSL connection with a SMC Barricade router in f
julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am glad to see discussion about system security because I am just
> considering to build a small LAN.
> Currently, I use a DSL connection with a SMC Barricade router in front of my
> RedHat 7.2 box. SMC advertised Barricade as a
I am glad to see discussion about system security because I am just
considering to build a small LAN.
Currently, I use a DSL connection with a SMC Barricade router in front of my
RedHat 7.2 box. SMC advertised Barricade as a router that has an effective
built-in firewall.
I do not plan to
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Mike Chambers blurted out:
MC>Try this link and check out logcheck and portsentry.
MC>
MC>http://www.psionic.com
MC>
MC>I haven't checked but these may or may not be on the powertools cd as well.
They are both on the powertools CD from Seawolf as well as hostsentry.
--
Chuc
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 2:49 PM
Subject: System (security) monitors?
>
> What are the best (or perhaps the most common) firewall (and
> otherwise other types of servers) programs that people are using to
> monitor things like portscans, sniffers and
x27;s 1) not an important machine 2) able to be
resetup in 10 minutes from scratch, to remove everything the
hacker has done.
Bill Ward
-Original Message-
From: Ashley M. Kirchner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 3:49 PM
To: Red Hat Mailing List
Subject: System (secu
I like snort the best.
www.snort.org
-Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Ashley M. Kirchner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 3:49 PM
To: Red Hat Mailing List
Subject: System (security) monitors?
What are the best (or perhaps the most common) firewall (and
What are the best (or perhaps the most common) firewall (and
otherwise other types of servers) programs that people are using to
monitor things like portscans, sniffers and what not. Basically stuff
to detect malicious attacks, intrusions and what not. Obviously they go
(I assume) hand in h
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 08:22:40AM -0500, Jim Baxter wrote:
> -Hi All
> I ask this question a while back but forgot to put a subject on it. I filter
> messages with no subject and I guess some of you do also.
> Here is my problem. I know little about system security from the interne
-Hi All
I ask this question a while back but forgot to put a subject on it. I filter
messages with no subject and I guess some of you do also.
Here is my problem. I know little about system security from the internet
since we have never linked or main systems that way. Now we have a new
guy
17 matches
Mail list logo
