Re: solaris mounting under linux

2001-02-23 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi David, > Yes, Solaris runs fine from it. I installed Solaris first, then I > disconnected the Solaris drive during the linux install, per > http://www.xslt.de/sol-howto.html, so linux wouldn't treat it as swap > space. If this is a dedicated Solaris disk you should definitely

Re: solaris mounting under linux

2001-02-23 Thread David Webb
Hi, Yes, Solaris runs fine from it. I installed Solaris first, then I disconnected the Solaris drive during the linux install, per http://www.xslt.de/sol-howto.html, so linux wouldn't treat it as swap space. David --- Leonard den Ottolander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi David, >

Re: solaris mounting under linux

2001-02-22 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi David, > I think I did create a solaris partition. Does the output from > fdisk, cfdisk, and sfdisk below give a clear indication of whether I > did or not? The geometry of the disk doesn't tell me whether the partititions labeled 0x82 are swap partitions or Solaris partit

Re: solaris mounting under linux

2001-02-22 Thread David Webb
Hi, I think I did create a solaris partition. Does the output from fdisk, cfdisk, and sfdisk below give a clear indication of whether I did or not? I'll take a look at the linux+freebsd-howto. Thanks for telling me about it. David --- Leonard den Ottolander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: solaris mounting under linux

2001-02-22 Thread David Webb
Thanks for your reply! --- Leonard den Ottolander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi David, > > > I don't know why I'm getting the "WARNING: bad format on line 11 of > > /etc/fstab" during booting. The /etc/fstab is ten lines long, and > > I opened it in emacs while in X to confirm t

Re: solaris mounting under linux

2001-02-22 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi David, > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, > or too many mounted file systems If I look at your fstab it seems you use sdb only for Solaris. Are you sure you created a Solaris partition (/dev/sdb1), or did you use the whole disk (/dev/s

Re: solaris mounting under linux

2001-02-19 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi David, > I don't know why I'm getting the "WARNING: bad format on line 11 of > /etc/fstab" during booting. The /etc/fstab is ten lines long, and > I opened it in emacs while in X to confirm that there is no blank > line at the top of the file. Maybe there is a (n invisible)

Re: solaris mounting under linux

2001-02-18 Thread David Webb
Thanks for your reply! I'm sure that I compiled the ufs file system support into the 2.4.0 kernel. I created the Solaris directory is under /. I don't know why I'm getting the "WARNING: bad format on line 11 of /etc/fstab" during booting. The /etc/fstab is ten lines long, and I opened it in emac

Re: solaris mounting under linux

2001-02-17 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi David, I'm getting a little confused by all the kernel messages you provide us with (the fact that you include the kernel messages where you *don't* specify the "ufstype=" option), but you need the following: - Kernel or module support for the filesystem you try to mount. Ii

solaris mounting under linux

2001-02-17 Thread David Webb
Hi, I'm not sure where to ask for help on this, so I thought I'd try here first. I'm running RH6.2 on a 450mz Pentium III on an ASUS P3B-F. I have Redhat on one scsi drive and Solaris 7 on a seperate scsi drive off the same controller. I can boot through lilo successfully to either operating syst