Re: small request for list maintainers

On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Zoki wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Aaron Turner wrote: > > > > ->Aaron Turner, Core Developer http://vodka.linuxkb.org/~aturner/ > ^ > > > > *** I think I'm starting to understand what helped you through the long > d

Re: small request for list maintainers

The \ escape the following character and tells teh regular expression parser to match the character literally. From ... . (Period) is a special character that matches any single character except a newline. Using concatenation, we can make regular expre

Re: small request for list maintainers

On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Aaron Turner wrote: ->Aaron Turner, Core Developer http://vodka.linuxkb.org/~aturner/ ^ *** I think I'm starting to understand what helped you through the long dark nights while working on procmail... It's a bitch to

Re: small request for list maintainers

Then use a procmail log analysis tool to tell you where your mail went. I recommend proclog: http://www.pobox.com/~aturner/proclog/ I'm not only a happy user, but the author as well. :) -- Aaron Turner, Core Developer http://vodka.linuxkb.org/~aturner/ Linux Knowledge Base Organization

Re: small request for list maintainers

On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: > Could we auto-prepend [rh-list] (or somethign similar) to posts sent > through the listserv? > Would make sorting inboxes a little easier and I'm sure I'm not the only > one who would like this. why not just filter based on to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?

Re: small request for list maintainers

Mohammad have you considered a mail client that can display the email messages in a different color or font? I happen to stick list maiul from several lists into one bulk folder, but color highlight them too, so I know what list they belong to. On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: > I

Re: small request for list maintainers

On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: ->Not all mailers can sort by X-headers and I wasn't looking to sort into ->different mailboxes. ->In any case, since it seems there are people completely against subject ->modification on the mailing list end I did some digging and found a way ->to d

Re: small request for list maintainers

nguage: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: small request for list maintainers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"ZgK3-.0.LU5.fdNLu"@lists.redhat.com> Resent-From: [

Re: small request for list maintainers

And like I said beforeI'm doing what I need with procmail and sed. :0 fhw * ^X-Mailing-List.* | sed 's/^Subject:\(.*\)/Subject: \[RedHat-List\] \1/' Allen Bolderoff wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > I _don't_ want to sort mails into mailboxes when they first come in > > because I don'

Re: small request for list maintainers

[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I _don't_ want to sort mails into mailboxes when they first come in > because I don't look at them then. [blah] allows me to quickly > recognize which list mail is from. If the subject doesnt grab my > attention (or after i'm done with reading one that did grab my > att

Re: small request for list maintainers

I _don't_ want to sort mails into mailboxes when they first come in because I don't look at them then. [blah] allows me to quickly recognize which list mail is from. If the subject doesnt grab my attention (or after i'm done with reading one that did grab my attention), then I chuck it into the re

Re: small request for list maintainers

On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: > > > Could we auto-prepend [rh-list] (or somethign similar) to posts sent > > through the listserv? > > Would make sorting inboxes a little easier and I'm sure I'm not the only > > one who would like th

Re: small request for list maintainers

Quoting "Mohammad A. Haque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Not all mailers can sort by X-headers and I wasn't looking to sort into > different mailboxes. > In any case, since it seems there are people completely against subject > modification on the mailing list end I did some digging and found a way > t

Re: small request for list maintainers

On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: > Could we auto-prepend [rh-list] (or somethign similar) to posts sent > through the listserv? > Would make sorting inboxes a little easier and I'm sure I'm not the only > one who would like this. Why not use procmail to sort your incoming mail based

Re: small request for list maintainers

Not all mailers can sort by X-headers and I wasn't looking to sort into different mailboxes. In any case, since it seems there are people completely against subject modification on the mailing list end I did some digging and found a way to do it myself using procmail and sed. Thanks anyways Alle

Re: small request for list maintainers

[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > X-mailing-list: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/9056 > X-loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] all emails from redhat lists have this. sort on the X-loop header. easy. -- +++ Allen Bolderoff <[EMAIL PROT

Re: small request for list maintainers

No! This is what the X-Mailing-List header is for. An example procmail script would be: :0 ^X-Mailing-List.* redhat-list Red Hat did it right by not putting in those horrible subject line modifiers. -- Aaron Turner, Core Developer http://vodka.linuxkb.org/~aturner/ Linux Knowledge Base

Re: small request for list maintainers

I haven't been on the list for long, but I agree, the volume is HUGE. Of course, if I had a better mail reader, I probably would need this. It would be helpfull though. >Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 18:00:42 -0500 >From: "Mohammad A. Haque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Could we auto-prepend [rh-list] (or so

small request for list maintainers

Could we auto-prepend [rh-list] (or somethign similar) to posts sent through the listserv? Would make sorting inboxes a little easier and I'm sure I'm not the only one who would like this. Mohammad -- = http://www.haque.net/ Post your screenshots: