>
> Yep. Your original routing table looks ok to me but then I have never
> done the aliasing thing so I don't know what the eth1:0 should look
> like.
>
> I would probably try it with eth0 and eth1 first and then bring up
> eth1:0 after I got it working but I am a break a problem into chunks
> k
try the following command and see if it works
ping -I 10.1.1.2 10.1.5.1
rahul.
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Matthew Boeckman wrote:
>
> > Hmm. Are saying that if you try to ping the eth1 interface from a
> > machine attached to the network on eth0 it does not work? If so what is
> > does the routing
> Hmm. Are saying that if you try to ping the eth1 interface from a
> machine attached to the network on eth0 it does not work? If so what is
> does the routing table on the ping orignating machine look like? It
> needs to be told that the router is the gateway to that network.
to refresh, th
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 08:38, Matthew Boeckman wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Not sure about the Network unreachable but I do not think you need a gw
> > on the router since the route is already attached to the network. THe
> > gateway is to tell a machine ," since you don;t know anything about this
> >
>
>
> Not sure about the Network unreachable but I do not think you need a gw
> on the router since the route is already attached to the network. THe
> gateway is to tell a machine ," since you don;t know anything about this
> network, here is where to send these packets.
>
right, but i stil
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 20:58, Matthew Boeckman wrote:
>
> I'm setting up a linux router to fit in the topology below:
> This is straight IP addresses, I'm using NAT addresses to protect the
> innocent. Please note that this box does not do/need to do any NAT or MASQ
>
> Upstreamli
I'm setting up a linux router to fit in the topology below:
This is straight IP addresses, I'm using NAT addresses to protect the
innocent. Please note that this box does not do/need to do any NAT or MASQ
Upstreamlinux routerinternal network
10.1.1.1/30
Hi Paul
First, I think you missed the fact that the problem is solved.
Second, I know how to tunnel X through ssh. This pc has no X libs, apps
or anything. An X gui is in no way appropriate for this task. Then I did
say I would *rather* edit the files anyway :)
charles
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 12
o: Redhat List
Subject: RE: simple default route question, RH7.2 [SOLVED]
Hi Paul, thanks for replying
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 11:32, Paul Hamm wrote:
> The location is in /etc/sysconfig/networking/profiles/default/ there
is
> another one in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ there is a new ver
;t have them.
Thanks though, and see below for my fix.
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Galpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:28 AM
> To: Redhat List
> Subject: simple default route question, RH7.2
>
>
> I can't figure out
Charles Galpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Redhat List
Subject: simple default route question, RH7.2
I can't figure out where the default route gets set up in 7.2. For
whatever reason I didn't get prompted to setup networking during the
install, so I
I can't figure out where the default route gets set up in 7.2. For
whatever reason I didn't get prompted to setup networking during the
install, so I set it up manually. From the looks of it, ifup uses the
GATEWAY and GATEWAYDEV env variables set in /etc/sysconfig/network to do
this automatically,
12 matches
Mail list logo
