On 12 Oct 2002, Doug Potter wrote:
> Dose anyone know of a like command for procinfo? This worked in 7.3 but
> doesn't appear to be included with 8.0. Also the lsdev command is no
> longer included.
Make sure you've installed the procinfo rpm.
--
"The only thing t
Dose anyone know of a like command for procinfo? This worked in 7.3 but
doesn't appear to be included with 8.0. Also the lsdev command is no
longer included.
I know I can go through the /proc directory. But these commands were
alot easier..
Thanks
Doug
--
redhat-list mailing
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 12:03:15PM -0400, Doug Potter wrote:
>
> Dose anyone know of a like command for procinfo? This worked in 7.3 but
> doesn't appear to be included with 8.0. Also the lsdev command is no
> longer included.
It was included in mine. ???
[hal@cadillac ha
This was about the long post on weird numbers for `sar` and `procinfo` on
2 of 4 VALinux servers.
I received a reply on one of the newsgroups (comp.os.linux.redhat) whose
author believed there is a bug allowing the the uptime counter to loop.
And my problem was happening because it looks like
/linux/include/linux/tasks.h - but everything else left the same.
All 4 pretty much run the same applications, though there are slight
differences - that wouldn't cause this problem. There is something
very strange when I run `procinfo` or `sar` on boxes 2 & 4, they give
ridiculous res
I forgot to mention, this is an RH7 system (with all patches up to date
as of this morning). I just tried the same thing (procinfo vs. uptime) on
an RH5.2 system that's only been up for 3 days, and the values are
correct. The same applies for an RH6.2 system (the values are correct in
When I look at 'procinfo' on my system, I get the following values:
user: 11:33:10.03 0.3% page in : 50793689 disk 1:
11403320r11550948w
nice: 0:00:37.00 0.0% page out: 23066158
system: 5:34:56.85 0.1% swap in : 18304831 disk 3:
158662r 0w
idle:
Does anyone know why the "procinfo" rpm (contains things like lsdev and socklist)
wouldn't be installed on a server? Could it cause some problem for me to install it?
Seems so basic there had to be a reason to leave it off..