-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 12:58:28 +0100, Martin Spütz wrote:
> > What version of Red Hat Linux is this?
> it's 7.2
>
> > What kind of Internet connection is it?
> German T-DSL, ADSL
>
> > Don't rp-pppoe and redhat-config-network work for you?
>
> I havn
Hi,
> What version of Red Hat Linux is this?
it's 7.2
> What kind of Internet connection is it?
German T-DSL, ADSL
> Don't rp-pppoe and redhat-config-network work for you?
I havn't installed X, it's a simple dsl router + firwall. On Monday I
install RedHat 7.3 or 8.0 and then it runs, hopefully
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 09:35:21 +0100, Martin Spütz wrote:
> I have a problem.
>
> [/var/log/messages]
> pppd[1426]: Couldn't load plugin pppoe.so
> pppd[1584]: /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.0/pppoe.so: undefined symbol :
> recv_config_hook
>
> A new pppd version
Hi,
I have a problem.
[/var/log/messages]
pppd[1426]: Couldn't load plugin pppoe.so
pppd[1584]: /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.0/pppoe.so: undefined symbol :
recv_config_hook
A new pppd version does not help. So I can not connect to the internet.
What can I make?
Regards,
Martin
--
redhat-list mailing
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Selim Jahangir wrote:
>
> Dear All
> please help me. I am in big problem with pppd in rh6.2. This was ok in rh6.0.
> I used chmod u+s pppd in rh6.0 and other users can run pppd but in rh6.2 i did the
>same but only root but no users can run pppd.
>
> It says remote system
CTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: PPPd problem
> Well, quite frankly.. root should be the only one to control
> interfaces.. otherwise you get yourself into major major major security
> problems :)
>
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Selim Jahangir wrote:
>
> > De
Well, quite frankly.. root should be the only one to control
interfaces.. otherwise you get yourself into major major major security
problems :)
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Selim Jahangir wrote:
> Dear All
> please help me. I am in big problem with pppd in rh6.2. This was ok in rh6.0.
> I used chmod u
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Selim Jahangir wrote:
> It says remote system should be authenticated. What's the wrong ?
Add "noauth" to /etc/ppp/options. PPPd no longer allows you to connect to
an IP for which you already have a route unless it authenticates itself.
MSG
Dear All
please help me. I am in big problem with pppd in
rh6.2. This was ok in rh6.0.
I used chmod u+s pppd in rh6.0 and other users can
run pppd but in rh6.2 i did the same but only root but no users can run
pppd.
It says remote system should be authenticated.
What's the wrong ?
Help
I'm quite tired or I'd spend more time to try an help out here..If you
don't get it going this way let me know and I'll try harder tomorrow when
I'm awake. =)
http://www.valleynet.bc.ca/~dan/autoppp.html
It sounds like you can leave mgetty alone.
You should compile and install a fresh ppp-2.2.0
Hi!
I have a small Ethernet network with 2 PCs with Windows95/NT4.0 and a PC
running RedHat 5.0 as server. I have also already a PPP connection from the
server to the Internet through a provider. I have only one phone line
available.
Now I have bought a notebook with Windows95 and I would like t
11 matches
Mail list logo
