-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 01:26:26AM -0400 or thereabouts, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> On 22-Jul-2002/22:16 -0500, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Tony,
> >Thanks much for the info. I am going to try this, as it make sense when
> >dealing with t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-Jul-2002/22:16 -0500, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Tony,
>Thanks much for the info. I am going to try this, as it make sense when
>dealing with the other people who do not use Mutt's advanced features. I
>really appreciate you taking the ti
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:54:34PM -0400 or thereabouts, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> On 22-Jul-2002/10:52 -0500, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Just thougth about how you would inline encrypting text, not just
> >signing. How do you handle this using VIM, if I might ask? Since I have
> See
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-Jul-2002/10:52 -0500, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Just thougth about how you would inline encrypting text, not just
>signing. How do you handle this using VIM, if I might ask? Since I have
>GPG in my .muttrc file now, it is automatically
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 01:38:33AM -0400 or thereabouts, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> On 19-Jul-2002/12:28 -0500, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> > It is really stupid to use this old outdated method.
> Setting up mutt to send/receive inline OpenPGP messages was not difficult.
> The ha
