On Sat, 2002-04-27 at 12:11, E. Joshua Rigler wrote:
> Please forgive me if this is something that has been asked (and
> answered) many times before...the redhat-list archive is VERY long, and
> since it is private, I can't use google to search it.
for a searchable archive try:
http://www.pra
Please forgive me if this is something that has been asked (and
answered) many times before...the redhat-list archive is VERY long, and
since it is private, I can't use google to search it.
I just installed RH-7.2. I installed "everything". In the installation
process, I turned off firewalling
** Reply to message from Charles Galpin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 8 Aug 2000 10:15:03 -0400 (EDT)
H. None of the Linksys tulip drivers that I try will compile with
my gcc-2.95-2. Throws out tons of errors. I think I will have to go to
rawhide and try to download the latest gcc build and t
I've had trouble with newer versions of this card. Try using the driver
off their website, instead of Donald Becker's.
hth
charles
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Jack Bowling wrote:
> Having nothing but problems trying to network 2 linux boxes together.
> The problem box has a Linksys Lite-On chipset car
Okay, how are the cables hooked up ? Are the two machines connected
directly to each
other ? If so, is the cable crossed over ? If your going through a hub,
are the cables
in the right order (ie. if your on a cable mode, run the cable->hub
connection through
the uplink connection.. if so, some
Having nothing but problems trying to network 2 linux boxes together.
The gateway box has a 3Com 3c509 which loads up perfectly using the
3c509 driver. The problem box has a Linksys Lite-On chipset card which
loads up with the tulip driver. However as the following paste from
ifconfig shows, there
Thanks for all of the suggestions. I'm learning. I'm not all that sure that
I'm learning things I really want to know (like in the years that I did my own
car repairs tearing engines apart and putting them sort of back together again)
...and I'm even less sure that I am making progress.
Last ni
on 25/2/2000 12:50 PM, Bill Carlson shot down the bitstream:
> Actually NAT is usually reserved to mapping one IP to another or a group
> of IPs to another group of IPs.
>
> IP Masquerading is actually PAT, Port Address Translation. In that case
> packets are rewritten to contain the IP address
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Edward Marczak wrote:
> on 23/2/2000 11:17 AM, Michael D Green shot down the bitstream:
>
> >> are you using NAT? I don't quite follow.
> >
> > What is NAT?
>
> I didn't see anyone answer this, so here goes:
>
> NAT is Network address translation. A router uses NAT to ch
may I add that in the Linux world, NAT is more commonly called Masquerading.
You will find many more pointers using this name in linux community and webb pages.
Philippe
Edward Marczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on 23/2/2000 11:17 AM, Michael D Green shot down the bitstream:
>
> >> are yo
on 23/2/2000 11:17 AM, Michael D Green shot down the bitstream:
>> are you using NAT? I don't quite follow.
>
> What is NAT?
I didn't see anyone answer this, so here goes:
NAT is Network address translation. A router uses NAT to change your real
IP address outbound, and back again inbound. W
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 11:17:20AM -0500, Michael D Green wrote:
| On Tue, 22 Feb 2000 , Adam Sleight wrote:
| > this stuff is easyjust not the first time you do it...then you'll
| > get the
| > big picture..
| > are you using NAT? I don't quite follow.
| What is NAT?
Network Address Translat
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000 , Adam Sleight wrote:
> Original Message
>
> this stuff is easyjust not the first time you do it...then you'll
> get the
> big picture..
>
> are you using NAT? I don't quite follow.
What is NAT?
> 192.168.1.0/24 network???
What does the /24 mean? I'v
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Mike Green wrote:
> Now on to the next level of my endeavor: trying to get my Linux machine to
> talk to my Windows 95 and 98 machines over the network where those Windows
> machines are already talking to one another (on a peer basis)... I'll likely
> have more questions.
W
y, if its
version 2 i don't think it'll work with linux. I had to throw my old 10MBit
Realtek back in.
-Original Message-
From: exqt [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 1999 2:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: networking problems
Hi, today I in
ditto to both of you. I think their website refers you to Donald Beckers
site, but I tried the latest drivers before giving up for a netgear. And
yeas, I have one of the older ones which work great, and were the reason
for buying more.
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, exqt wrote:
> Well if that's the case I'
---
> > From: exqt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 23:10
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: networking problems
> >
> >
> > Hi, today I installed Red Hat 6.0 on my system. The installation went
> > perfect, Red Hat
orange
box. This may be the culprit (mine acted the same way. I gave up and bought
a 3Com 905B when the released drivers).
Best of luck.
Patrick
> -Original Message-
> From: exqt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 23:10
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subj
See the howto's, having a static IP simplifies your life greatly...
-JMS
- Original Message -
From: exqt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 1999 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: networking problems
> it's actually a static ip addre
need to set this up...
-JMS
- Original Message -
From: Jon Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 1999 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: networking problems
> how do you get out onto the internet? cable modem? I know squat about
> @Home :(
>
it's actually a static ip address.
Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 04:10:03PM -0700, exqt wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi, today I installed Red Hat 6.0 on my system. The installation went
> > perfect, Red Hat detected my network card, I configured everything, but
> > when I rebooted and trie
On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 04:10:03PM -0700, exqt wrote:
>
>
> Hi, today I installed Red Hat 6.0 on my system. The installation went
> perfect, Red Hat detected my network card, I configured everything, but
> when I rebooted and tried pinging hostnames/IP's I got "Network
> Unreachable". I don't kn
how do you get out onto the internet? cable modem? I know squat about
@Home :(
try to ping localhost. if that doesnt work, then I suspect the
installation only *appeared* to go perfect.
if it does work, there's a few things you can try.
as root: ifconfig.
this should usually show at least a 'l
Hi, today I installed Red Hat 6.0 on my system. The installation went
perfect, Red Hat detected my network card, I configured everything, but
when I rebooted and tried pinging hostnames/IP's I got "Network
Unreachable". I don't know what's wrong so I ask you to please help me.
Here is some more
Hi, today I installed Red Hat 6.0 on my system. The installation went
perfect, Red Hat detected my network card, I configured everything, but
when I rebooted and tried pinging hostnames/IP's I got "Network
Unreachable". I don't know what's wrong so I ask you to please help me.
Here is some more de
Hi,
I ve setted getty (following PPP tips docs).
following instructions of PPP How To tips,
I ve created file /etc/conf.uugetty.ttyS3 with
followin contents:
SYSTEM=
Login=/bin/login
INITLINE=cua3
INIT="" \d\d+++\dAT\r OK\r\n..etc..
Then I configured /etc/gettydefs, configuring following line:
#
26 matches
Mail list logo
