RE: namebased vs ipbased hosting

2000-08-11 Thread Charles Boening
11, 2000 8:41 AM To: Redhat-List Subject: Re: namebased vs ipbased hosting On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Robert Friberg wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm setting up a server that is hosting several sites. The number > of sites will most likely increase in the near future. I'm > using

[RHL] Re: namebased vs ipbased hosting

2000-08-11 Thread Glen Lee Edwards
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Robert Friberg wrote: > >Hi, > >I'm setting up a server that is hosting several sites. The number >of sites will most likely increase in the near future. I'm >using name based virtual hosts. I understand this can be a problem >with http clients not sending a Host-header. I li

Re: namebased vs ipbased hosting

2000-08-11 Thread Bill Carlson
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Robert Friberg wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm setting up a server that is hosting several sites. The number > of sites will most likely increase in the near future. I'm > using name based virtual hosts. I understand this can be a problem > with http clients not sending a Host-heade

namebased vs ipbased hosting

2000-08-11 Thread Robert Friberg
Hi, I'm setting up a server that is hosting several sites. The number of sites will most likely increase in the near future. I'm using name based virtual hosts. I understand this can be a problem with http clients not sending a Host-header. I like not having to bother with ip-adresses. Are there