Your email is bugged.
> --- Ursprungligt meddelande ---
>
> Från: Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ämne: Re: missing posting
> Datum:Wed, 28 May 2003 14:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Did you check gnu.org for docs that may be closer to helping you qui
There is a similar comparision on the same page of Solaris ld and the
GCC/GNU/Whoever writes it for linux LD on the link I had provided below.
Cheers,
Aly.
> >
> > http://www.redhat.com/docs/wp/solaris_port/x99.html
> >
--
Aly S.P Dharshi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student and System Admin
The -M is more than likely a flag to the loader on your solaris platform
not the compiler. See 'man ld' or 'info ld' on your linux box and man ld
on your solaris box and see if there is a correllary between the two loaders
for this operation.
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Have you taken a look at the
Did you check gnu.org for docs that may be closer to helping you quickly than this news group??
Benjamin[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello?I've posted the following problem 2 times to the read hat list and have yet to see it appear in the summaries I receive. I posted the last one this morning (Wedne
Hi Eric,
Have you taken a look at the Solaris to RedHat Porting guide at:
http://www.redhat.com/docs/wp/solaris_port/x99.html
This will help ! Again if you were using Solaris SparcWorks software
such as Forte that would be the comparison chart. Also look at the Intel
C/C++ compiler for Linu
Hello?
I've posted the following problem 2 times to the read hat list and have yet to see it
appear in the summaries I receive. I posted the last one this morning (Wednesday) and
have since received another summary without my message. What gives?
The problem I'm having:
I'm working on a Solaris
