Re: Purpose of /var/lib/rpm/log/log.XXXX file

2017-04-24 Thread Jonathan Billings
What version of 'rpm' are you using? What's the output of 'rpm -q rpm'? On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:17 AM, S Sai Krishna Prasad wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to know what is the use of log. file that is present in > the directory /var/lib/rpm/lo

Purpose of /var/lib/rpm/log/log.XXXX file

2017-04-24 Thread S Sai Krishna Prasad
Hi All, I would like to know what is the use of log. file that is present in the directory /var/lib/rpm/log/. I saw that when I rebuild the rpm database using the command "rpm --rebuilddb" a new file is created and the older one is removed but the size of the file remains the sam

Re: Permission changing for /var/log/httpd

2016-06-03 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:02:21PM +, Yong Huang wrote: > If logrotate (as Mark suggested) did not do it, you can use > SystemTap to do this sort of things. There are sample scripts on the > Internet that monitor file permission change. > Maybe these >help:https://www.sourceware.org/systemtap/

Re: Permission changing for /var/log/httpd

2016-06-03 Thread Yong Huang
If logrotate (as Mark suggested) did not do it, you can use SystemTap to do this sort of things. There are sample scripts on the Internet that monitor file permission change. Maybe these help:https://www.sourceware.org/systemtap/SystemTap_Beginners_Guide/inodewatch2sect.html https://lwn.net/Arti

Re: Permission changing for /var/log/httpd

2016-06-03 Thread Tom Ekberg
That was a good guess, but the logrotate setting for httpd says: create 640 root adm The other 3 create lines in /etc/logrotate.d/ are for other log files. Tom Ekberg From: m.r...@5-cent.us To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" Subject: Re: Permission changing for /var

Re: Permission changing for /var/log/httpd

2016-06-02 Thread m . roth
Tom Ekberg wrote: > I have a non-root cron job that needs to look at files in /var/log/httpd > and transfer them (scp) to another host. That user is a member of group > adm and I changed the ownership of /var/log/httpd to root:adm and set > permissions to 750. This works file as the

Permission changing for /var/log/httpd

2016-06-02 Thread Tom Ekberg
I have a non-root cron job that needs to look at files in /var/log/httpd and transfer them (scp) to another host. That user is a member of group adm and I changed the ownership of /var/log/httpd to root:adm and set permissions to 750. This works file as the cron job can read the files. The

Re: how to clear log files

2003-10-20 Thread Srini Amble
I am running RedHat 8. My logfiles fill up once a week and take a lot of space in HDD. I just want to create a batch file to clean all the files once a week. Any idea how can i do that ? I guess i will run it through anacron, but i do not know how to create the batch file. Any idea is apprecia

Re: how to clear log files

2003-10-20 Thread Jason Dixon
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 12:25, Genti Hila wrote: > hi, > > I am running RedHat 8. > My logfiles fill up once a week and take a lot of space in HDD. I just > want to create a batch file to clean all the files once a week. Any > idea how can i do that ? Check out logrotate. The default config (/etc

how to clear log files

2003-10-20 Thread Genti Hila
hi,   I am running RedHat 8. My logfiles fill up once a week and take a lot of space in HDD. I just want to create a batch file to clean all the files once a week. Any idea how can i do that ?   I guess i will run it through anacron, but i do not know how to create the batch file. Any idea i

Server modification log WAS RE: Firewall - Limit Geographic Area

2003-10-16 Thread Chris W. Parker
Kent Borg <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thursday, October 16, 2003 2:35 PM said: > P.S. Non-security advice: Keep a log of everything you do to your > server. It will not only be useful as a reference, but it will slow > you down in how you mangle your server by forcing yo

Server modification log WAS RE: Firewall - Limit Geographic Area

2003-10-16 Thread Chris W. Parker
Kent Borg <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thursday, October 16, 2003 2:35 PM said: > P.S. Non-security advice: Keep a log of everything you do to your > server. It will not only be useful as a reference, but it will slow > you down in how you mangle your server by forcing yo

Re: /var/log/secure messages?

2003-09-25 Thread Goncalo
> I see the following in /var/log/secure. Can anyone tell me what this > means? They are not always paired up like this. I often see the second > message without the first. > > Sep 22 15:27:59 avalon sshd[4643]: scanned from 69.44.57.202 with > SSH-1.0-SSH_Version_Mapper. Don&

/var/log/secure messages?

2003-09-25 Thread Robert C. Paulsen Jr.
I see the following in /var/log/secure. Can anyone tell me what this means? They are not always paired up like this. I often see the second message without the first. Sep 22 15:27:59 avalon sshd[4643]: scanned from 69.44.57.202 with SSH-1.0-SSH_Version_Mapper. Don't panic. Sep 22 15:

log message for HD crash, is this hardware failure?

2003-09-19 Thread Reuben D. Budiardja
e HD again, better just replace it, since the server is our development database server. Here is the log from /var/log/message. I asked help to interpret this. Thanks for your help. RDB Sep 18 04:08:36 voyager kernel: hdd: dma_intr: status=0x60 { DriveReady DeviceFault } Sep 18 04:08:36 voyager ke

Re: split apache access log for webaliser

2003-09-12 Thread Peter Kiem
Hi Brett, > http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/vhosts/fd-limits.html Hmmm interesting, don't remember reading about that before but I guess it makes sense. I've got a fairly busy server that serves over 100 virtual hosts as well as DNS, FTP, IMAP, POP3, SMTP, etc etc etc and it's still only using

Re: split apache access log for webaliser

2003-09-12 Thread Bret Hughes
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 09:06, Michael Gargiullo wrote: > On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 22:22, Bret Hughes wrote: > > what do folk use to split log files by vhost for webaliser analysis? > > > > Bret > > > I ended up keeping separate log files for each vhost. It ended up b

Re: split apache access log for webaliser

2003-09-12 Thread Michael Gargiullo
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 22:22, Bret Hughes wrote: > what do folk use to split log files by vhost for webaliser analysis? > > Bret > I ended up keeping separate log files for each vhost. It ended up being easier to manage in the end. -- Michael Gargiullo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> W

Re: split apache access log for webaliser

2003-09-11 Thread Bret Hughes
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 22:35, Peter Kiem wrote: > > what do folk use to split log files by vhost for webaliser analysis? > > Apache :) > > Log each vhost into their own logfile...Simple! > Yeah I thought about that but I hate looking in multiple logs for problems. Not

Re: split apache access log for webaliser

2003-09-11 Thread Peter Kiem
> what do folk use to split log files by vhost for webaliser analysis? Apache :) Log each vhost into their own logfile...Simple! -- Regards, +-+-+ | Peter Kiem.^. | E-Mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | |

split apache access log for webaliser

2003-09-11 Thread Bret Hughes
what do folk use to split log files by vhost for webaliser analysis? Bret -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: named error log

2003-09-02 Thread Daniel Tan
CTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 10:35 PM Subject: RE: named error log Daniel Tan wrote: > i would like to know what these errors mean? > why did it failed? [snip] All of these logfile entries look to be DDNS updates that were rejected by your DNS serv

Re: /var/log/message error question

2003-09-01 Thread Mark Neidorff
for inactivity (something wicked). Mark On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, cajun wrote: > Hi all, > > Was wondering if anyone has ever seen something like this in there > message log file: > > *Aug 31 05:28:56 localhost pppoe[7106]: Inactivity timeout... something > wicked happened on sessi

/var/log/message error question

2003-09-01 Thread cajun
Hi all, Was wondering if anyone has ever seen something like this in there message log file: *Aug 31 05:28:56 localhost pppoe[7106]: Inactivity timeout... something wicked happened on session 40919* I am running RH9 with all of the latest updates. I have a DSL connection setup and have 2

RE: named error log

2003-09-01 Thread Cowles, Steve
Daniel Tan wrote: > i would like to know what these errors mean? > why did it failed? [snip] All of these logfile entries look to be DDNS updates that were rejected by your DNS server. 1) Are your zone definitions configured to allow DDNS update (allow-update) requests from dhcp clients? 2) Is

named error log

2003-09-01 Thread Daniel Tan
i would like to know what these errors mean? why did it failed? Sep 1 12:57:13 mail named[32135]: client 192.168.0.72#3400: update '0.168.192.i n-addr.arpa/IN' denied Sep 1 13:05:36 mail named[32135]: client 192.168.0.217#4911: updating zone 'sho pnsave.com.sg/IN': update failed: 'RRset exists (

RE: NIS client couldn't log in

2003-09-01 Thread Zhou, Rongx
Thank you for your support. Ypwhich shows it can bind my slave nis server. I tail -f /var/log/messages. It show some "refuse connect from ." What is the proper cause? Or I will do it from the scratch. -Original Message- From: Rick Warner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP

2003-08-31 Thread Reuben D. Budiardja
On Saturday 30 August 2003 09:34 pm, Jeffrey F. Lawhorn wrote: > Yes, you're fine. I did some tests today and I get the same behavior. The > logs look like it did a proxy transfer, but in reality it just sent my test > homepage. Allright. Thanks for the info and confirmation, Mike and Jeff. RD

Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP

2003-08-31 Thread Jeffrey F. Lawhorn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 Aug 2003 21:00:48 EDT." <[EM

Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP

2003-08-31 Thread Reuben D. Budiardja
our > web server on port 80 and issue the same or similar GET request. In my > case the URL requested is ignored and the web page's proper data is > returned but like you the entry in the access log show: > > "GET http://www.webtwo.com/"; 200 16991 "-" "-&

Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP

2003-08-30 Thread MKlinke
e the URL requested is ignored and the web page's proper data is returned but like you the entry in the access log show: "GET http://www.webtwo.com/"; 200 16991 "-" "-" when, for example test this against www.webone.com. Take a look at the number after the "

Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP

2003-08-30 Thread Reuben D. Budiardja
First of all, is this dangerous and make my machine vulnerable? RDB -- Reuben D. Budiardja Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN - /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign against HTML \ / email and proprietary forma

Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP

2003-08-30 Thread Reuben D. Budiardja
On Saturday 30 August 2003 01:40 am, Jeffrey F. Lawhorn wrote: > H were these always commented out at install time or at some later > time? If at a later time was apache restarted since the config changed? The config has never been changed since install. Apache was recently restarted (

Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP

2003-08-30 Thread Jeffrey F. Lawhorn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 Aug 2003 01:35:08 EDT." <[EM

Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP

2003-08-30 Thread Reuben D. Budiardja
p://www.sina.com.cn/ HTTP/1.1" 200 5809 > > > >I saw no corresponding error log. > > The problem is that your apache is configured with the proxy service > enabled. > > I would suggest that you comment out all of the entries in your > configuration file. I don&

Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP

2003-08-30 Thread Jeffrey F. Lawhorn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 Aug 2003 01:04:44 EDT." <[EM

Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP

2003-08-30 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: 61.170.193.85 - - [30/Aug/2003:00:58:35 -0400] "GET http://www.sina.com.cn/ HTTP/1.1" 200 5809 Do you have an open proxy? Close it. -- H| I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere. +

Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP

2003-08-30 Thread Reuben D. Budiardja
I saw this in my http access_log. What does this mean? 61.170.193.85 - - [30/Aug/2003:00:58:35 -0400] "GET http://www.sina.com.cn/ HTTP/1.1" 200 5809 I saw no corresponding error log. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks RDB -- Reuben D. Budiardja Department of P

Re: Log on to shell

2003-08-29 Thread Reuben D. Budiardja
On Friday 29 August 2003 05:26 am, Didier Casse wrote: > in your /etc/inittab: > > Change this line > > > id:5:initdefault: > > > to this > > id:3:initdefault: > That will take care of the default the next time you

Re: Log on to shell->part 2

2003-08-29 Thread Charles Bronson
Didier Casse wrote: or if you do not want to set it permanently to non-gui, just press Ctrl+Alt+F1 to get to Shell prompt! And alternately Ctrl+Alt+F7 to get back to the gui. I only add this because it's not necessarily intuitive. -- (¬_Some days you're the windshield>o) //\Some day

Re: Log on to shell->part 2

2003-08-29 Thread Didier Casse
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Gunawan wrote: > Hi, > Currently when I boot linux the GUI Logon screen appear. > How do I set so it will log in Shell prompt mode? > > TIA, > Gunawan > or if you do not want to set it permanently to non-gui, just press Ctrl+Alt+F1 to get to She

Re: Log on to shell

2003-08-29 Thread Didier Casse
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://ssls.nus.edu.sg On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Gunawan wrote: > Hi, > Currently when I boot linux the GUI Logon screen appear. > How do I set so it will log in Shell prompt mode? > > TIA, > Gunawan > -- redhat-list mai

Log on to shell

2003-08-29 Thread Gunawan
Hi, Currently when I boot linux the GUI Logon screen appear. How do I set so it will log in Shell prompt mode?   TIA, Gunawan  

RE: NIS client couldn't log in

2003-08-28 Thread Rick Warner
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 19:39, Zhou, Rongx wrote: > The following is logging messages from NIS client machine when I log into this > machine with a normal NIS account. Thanks. > > Aug 27 14:18:57 rzhoux-dev03 sshd(pam_unix)[881]: check pass; user unknown What does ypwhich return? Th

RE: NIS client couldn't log in

2003-08-28 Thread Zhou, Rongx
The following is logging messages from NIS client machine when I log into this machine with a normal NIS account. Thanks. Aug 27 14:18:57 rzhoux-dev03 sshd(pam_unix)[881]: check pass; user unknown -Original Message- From: Rick Warner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2003?8?28? 2:25 To

Re: NIS client couldn't log in

2003-08-27 Thread Rick Warner
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 11:08, jurvis lasalle wrote: > sorry for the delay- i'm moving this week and things are a little > hectic. i'll try to be as brief as possible (hah!)- > i have been configuring a kickstart installation for a college CS lab. > my configuration installs a base rh9 de

Re: NIS client couldn't log in

2003-08-27 Thread jurvis lasalle
On Tuesday, Aug 26, 2003, at 16:55 America/New_York, Rick Warner wrote: On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 13:17, jurvis lasalle wrote: Sorry, I failed to post the resolution to my problem. Once I turned off iptables, the client bound to the server and all the yptools worked as usual. As I stated in the

RE: NIS client couldn't log in

2003-08-27 Thread Rick Warner
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 18:23, Zhou, Rongx wrote: > Thanks all >Something I must clarify. > /etc/nsswitch.conf is set correctly as Rcik said > I can log in locally with root or normal user > No network connection problem, all testing linux boxes are connected together. > I th

RE: NIS client couldn't log in

2003-08-27 Thread Zhou, Rongx
Thanks all Something I must clarify. /etc/nsswitch.conf is set correctly as Rcik said I can log in locally with root or normal user No network connection problem, all testing linux boxes are connected together. I think it has nothing to do with iptables."ypcat passwd" execute success

Re: NIS client couldn't log in

2003-08-27 Thread Rick Warner
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 13:17, jurvis lasalle wrote: > > Sorry, I failed to post the resolution to my problem. Once I turned > off iptables, the client bound to the server and all the yptools worked > as usual. As I stated in the post at the time, I was (and still am) > very perplexed b

Re: NIS client couldn't log in

2003-08-26 Thread jurvis lasalle
On Tuesday, August 26, 2003, at 02:17 PM, Rick Warner wrote: On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 11:05, jurvis lasalle wrote: Actually rick, I had similar problems with rh9, NIS, and iptables as posted here http://info.ccone.at/INFO/Mail-Archives/redhat/Jul-2003/msg00806.html In broadcast mode i was able to u

Re: NIS client couldn't log in

2003-08-26 Thread Rick Warner
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 11:05, jurvis lasalle wrote: > > > Actually rick, I had similar problems with rh9, NIS, and iptables as > posted here > http://info.ccone.at/INFO/Mail-Archives/redhat/Jul-2003/msg00806.html > In broadcast mode i was able to use ypcat to list the nis maps although > i n

Re: NIS client couldn't log in

2003-08-26 Thread jurvis lasalle
r , a NIS slave and a NISclient. From the NIS client machine I type the ypcat passwd, I can see the newly added user accounts. But I can’t log in using this testing account through ssh. Can anyone give me advice? Thanks a lot. Since he can do ypcat and see the result the problem is not iptables; if it

Re: NIS client couldn't log in

2003-08-26 Thread Rick Warner
IS master , a NIS > > slave and a NISclient. From the NIS client machine I type the ypcat > > passwd, I can see the newly added user accounts. But I can’t log in > > using this testing account through ssh. Can anyone give me advice? > > Thanks a lot. Since he can do ypcat and

Re: NIS client couldn't log in

2003-08-26 Thread Ben Hall
can see the newly added user accounts. But I can’t log in > using this testing account through ssh. Can anyone give me advice? > Thanks a lot. > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:28:18 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > > Well, you could try unsparsing a file.. it's a blind shot, it makes no > >sense, but it's worth a try (on the smallest huge file). > > > >cp --sparse=always big.wav test.wav > > That's a

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 18:54:04 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > I could not open the file with khexedit, since it complained about > insufficient memory (I have only 256MB of RAM in this machine). But the > theory of it actually having spaces or zeroes

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Brian Ashe
Rodolfo, On Sunday August 24, 2003 11:28, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > Is there someone out there with some coding expertise, who can maybe > explain why "ls -l" and "ls -sh" give different results? Like this: Not that I read the code but it isn't too hard to derive the answer from the info page of

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 8/24/2003 22:04 -0400, you wrote: On Sunday 24 August 2003 07:07 pm, Jason Dixon wrote: > Sorry, I'm joining this thread way after the fact. The only thing I'll > mention is that I *have* seen certain applications zero out a very large > filesize in preparation for filling up that space with a

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 8/24/2003 23:17 -0300, you wrote: Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > I have no idea how to even start looking for this one Well, you could try unsparsing a file.. it's a blind shot, it makes no sense, but it's worth a try (on the smallest huge file). cp --sparse=always big.wav test.wav That's actually

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread David Kramer
On Sunday 24 August 2003 07:07 pm, Jason Dixon wrote: > Sorry, I'm joining this thread way after the fact. The only thing I'll > mention is that I *have* seen certain applications zero out a very large > filesize in preparation for filling up that space with a series of > chunks. Bit-torrent is t

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto
Rodolfo J. Paiz > Trying to figure out what caused this wrong listing and fix it, since > copying the file does take the whole 1.2GB Just got it, this is what I meant: if the files are sparse, cp --sparse=always wouldn't take the whole 1.2 GB. -- Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto
I wrote: > Well, you could try unsparsing a file.. it's a blind shot, it makes no > sense, but it's worth a try (on the smallest huge file). > > cp --sparse=always big.wav test.wav Please disconsider this - it's confuse. I didn't read all your posts well. Your files would be sparsed already

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > I have no idea how to even start looking for this one Well, you could try unsparsing a file.. it's a blind shot, it makes no sense, but it's worth a try (on the smallest huge file). cp --sparse=always big.wav test.wav -- Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto <[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Otto Haliburton
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rodolfo J. Paiz > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 8:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes? > > At 8/24/2003 20:08

RE: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 8/24/2003 20:08 -0500, you wrote: let me further explain with a example. Suppose you have a file that is 1024 bytes on linux and you do a ls it will list as 2 block (2 512 byte blocks). OK... but here the error would be at most a few KB, not an additional 1,130MB. You copy this file to a vf

RE: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Otto Haliburton
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jurvis lasalle > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 7:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes? > > > On Sunday, Aug

RE: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Otto Haliburton
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rodolfo J. Paiz > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 8:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes? > > At 8/24/200

NIS client couldn't log in

2003-08-25 Thread Zhou, Rongx
Hi, all   I recently setup NIS environment in linux boxes. I use Redhat 9.0. I think the environment set up properly with a NIS master , a NIS slave and a NIS client.  From the NIS client machine I type the ypcat passwd, I can see the newly added user accounts. But I can’t log in

RE: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 8/24/2003 19:55 -0500, you wrote: This maybe absolutely correct reporting. You said that windows and linux are sharing the disk that these files are stored. Ah, but the files are on an ext3 partition, on the Linux server, and only shared via Samba to the Windows boxen. So, while reasonable, we

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 8/24/2003 20:56 -0400, you wrote: Here's a stab in the dark- do you have the SIZE or BLOCKSIZE environment variable set (esp. when the wav files were originally "magnified")? Stab away, any effort welcome. I have never set those variables manually, and doing a "set | grep -i size" right now f

RE: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Otto Haliburton
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rodolfo J. Paiz > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 7:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes? > > At 8/24/200

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread jurvis lasalle
On Sunday, Aug 24, 2003, at 20:31 America/New_York, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: At 8/24/2003 19:07 -0400, you wrote: Sorry, I'm joining this thread way after the fact. The only thing I'll mention is that I *have* seen certain applications zero out a very large filesize in preparation for filling up

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 8/25/2003 01:35 +0200, you wrote: Okay. What else can you report about the integrity of the WAV files? When you load them into a somewhat capable audio player, is the displayed playtime correct? In that case, the internal file size in the WAV header would be correct. What do you see at the end o

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-25 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 8/24/2003 19:07 -0400, you wrote: Sorry, I'm joining this thread way after the fact. The only thing I'll mention is that I *have* seen certain applications zero out a very large filesize in preparation for filling up that space with a series of chunks. Bit-torrent is the *perfect* example of t

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-24 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:56:52 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > > The problem with your WAV files is not that they contain sparse > > blocks. If they did, they would not sound good, because you would hear > > every blank block. And since they are listed

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-24 Thread Jason Dixon
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 18:56, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > At 8/23/2003 10:13 +0200, you wrote: > >The problem with your WAV files is not that they contain sparse > >blocks. If they did, they would not sound good, because you would hear > >every blank block. And since they are listed as 20 times the ori

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-24 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 8/23/2003 10:13 +0200, you wrote: The problem with your WAV files is not that they contain sparse blocks. If they did, they would not sound good, because you would hear every blank block. And since they are listed as 20 times the original size, you would hear a lot of "silence", and each of them

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-23 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 00:03:43 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > Will "sparsing" or "unsparsing" the file (whichever is the one that fixes > the problem) eliminate those blank spaces? I have 40M files that (after > being copied to a second hard drive) s

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-23 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 8/22/2003 21:39 -0300, you wrote: Robert C. Paulsen Jr. wrote: > Perhaps you saved the file from within vi. That might "unsparse" the > file. Will "sparsing" or "unsparsing" the file (whichever is the one that fixes the problem) eliminate those blank spaces? I have 40M files that (after being

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-22 Thread Robert C. Paulsen Jr.
he --sparse option of cp ("man cp"). It looks like the > > following will work: (warning! I have not tried this!) > > > > cd /var/log > > mv lastlog lastlog-orig > > cp --sparse=always lastlog-orig lastlog > > du -h lastlog > >

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-22 Thread Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto
Robert C. Paulsen Jr. wrote: > Perhaps you saved the file from within vi. That might "unsparse" the > file. Yes.. but perhaps I didn't. :) > Read up on the --sparse option of cp ("man cp"). It looks like the > following will work: (warning! I have no

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-22 Thread Robert C. Paulsen Jr.
tell me how > to fix this? > Perhaps you saved the file from within vi. That might "unsparse" the file. Read up on the --sparse option of cp ("man cp"). It looks like the following will work: (warning! I have not tried this!) cd /var/log mv last

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-22 Thread Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto
Ronald W. Heiby wrote: > If, when you copy a sparse file, you do not take precautions to have > the copy also be sparse, the copy gets "filled in" and has a bunch of > bytes of 0x00 actually allocated on disk. Looks like that happened > here. > > Ron. Well, I'm quite sure I never copied it a

Re: ssh log tool

2003-08-22 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss
> Guys, > > Know of any ssh log tools? > > I want to know when someone logs into my ssh server That part is easy. Look at /var/log/secure > and the command that > they runpreferably real time... > is that too much to ask :). I don't know how to do this real-tim

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-21 Thread Ronald W. Heiby
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thursday, August 21, 2003, 9:39:30 PM, Herculano wrote: >OK.. I've seen this subject on lots of threads so I'll ask.. can you > explain this? > [EMAIL PROTECTED] logs]$ du -h /var/log/lastlog > 19M /var/log/lastlo

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-21 Thread Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto
OK.. I've seen this subject on lots of threads so I'll ask.. can you explain this? [EMAIL PROTECTED] logs]$ du -h /var/log/lastlog 19M /var/log/lastlog Thanks in advance -- Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscri

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 19:02:02 + (UTC), Mark Neidorff wrote: > Since I don't know, I'll askwhat are sparse blocks and Think of sparse blocks (aka "sparse files") as files with holes. Empty [not yet used] parts of a file are not written to disk

ssh log tool

2003-08-21 Thread n30
Guys, Know of any ssh log tools? I want to know when someone logs into my ssh server and the command that they runpreferably real time... is that too much to ask :). Thanks in advance -N -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-21 Thread Mark Neidorff
ote: > > > Can anyone explain why my /var/log/lastlog is 19 megabytes? > > It isn't. It just contains sparse blocks. See: > > du -h /var/log/lastlog > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: /var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:57:18 -0500, Robert C. Paulsen Jr. wrote: > Can anyone explain why my /var/log/lastlog is 19 megabytes? It isn't. It just contains sparse blocks. See: du -h /var/log/lastlog - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

/var/log/lastlog -- why is it 19 megabytes?

2003-08-21 Thread Robert C. Paulsen Jr.
Can anyone explain why my /var/log/lastlog is 19 megabytes? Here is the output from the "lastlog" command: Username Port From Latest root tty2 Wed Aug 20 16:27:44 -0500 2003 bin**Never

Re: Loooonnnngggg time to log in...Need advice

2003-08-19 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:51:21 -0700, Jason Williams wrote: > I also thought of that. Once I checked out the versions all of them are > running, they are all running the same version. > > Im thinking it has something to do with PAM or something...but

Re: Loooonnnngggg time to log in...Need advice

2003-08-19 Thread Jason Williams
I also thought of that. Once I checked out the versions all of them are running, they are all running the same version. Im thinking it has something to do with PAM or something...but I cannot put a finger on it... Jason At 12:49 PM 8/19/2003 -0500, you wrote: On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 12:12, Jason

Re: Loooonnnngggg time to log in...Need advice

2003-08-19 Thread Bret Hughes
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 12:12, Jason Williams wrote: > Thanks Sean. I do appreciate. > > Any idea how this occurred? This is the first time i've had this particular > problem. All of my other systems before these two had no problems at all. > Im just curious, from looking at the logs on the two ser

Re: Loooonnnngggg time to log in...Need advice

2003-08-19 Thread Jason Williams
t takes about 3-5 seconds for the password > prompt to show up... > This is really frustrating, so what i did was log in and start tailing the > message log. Here is what I found: > > Aug 19 09:43:44 corpmail sshd(pam_unix)[1702]: authentication failure; > logname= uid=0 euid=0 t

Re: Loooonnnngggg time to log in...Need advice

2003-08-19 Thread Sean Estabrooks
running RH 9.0. > Once I type in my username, it takes about 3-5 seconds for the password > prompt to show up... > This is really frustrating, so what i did was log in and start tailing the > message log. Here is what I found: > > Aug 19 09:43:44 corpmail sshd(pam_unix)[1702]: a

Loooonnnngggg time to log in...Need advice

2003-08-19 Thread Jason Williams
is is really frustrating, so what i did was log in and start tailing the message log. Here is what I found: Aug 19 09:43:44 corpmail sshd(pam_unix)[1702]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=NODEVssh ruser= rhost=jwilliams user=jwilliams Bingo! Something is wrong. I have a total of

Re: Evolution Change Log

2003-08-14 Thread Jason Dixon
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 10:12, David Hart wrote: > I know this is slightly OT but I hate to subscribe to yet another list. > > Anyway, I cannot find a change log for Evolution. I'm running 1.4.3 and > trying to find out what's changed in 1.4.4. Anyone? See attached. If you&#

Evolution Change Log

2003-08-05 Thread David Hart
I know this is slightly OT but I hate to subscribe to yet another list. Anyway, I cannot find a change log for Evolution. I'm running 1.4.3 and trying to find out what's changed in 1.4.4. Anyone? -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.c

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >