EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: kernel frustration
> hmm,..it seems i don't have a directory /usr/src/linux or the directory
> /usr/include/asm
refer below
> can you explain to me a different aproach to this,...step by step,..since
> i'm a little new to this...
Here's
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 10:39 PM
Subject: RE: kernel frustration
> > hmm,..it seems i don't have a directory /usr/src/linux or the directory
> > /usr/include/asm
>
> refer below
>
> > can you explain to me
> hmm,..it seems i don't have a directory /usr/src/linux or the directory
> /usr/include/asm
refer below
> can you explain to me a different aproach to this,...step by step,..since
> i'm a little new to this...
Here's my /usr/src directory:
drwxr-xr-x5 root root 1024 Feb 28 20
alf Of mjs
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: kernel frustration
just so i understand you correctly,..you mentioned RPMS
i didn't use RPM kernel,...i just downloaded the src and use that,..is that
what you mean??
-Original Message-
From: [
Nitebirdz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 25 Feb 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> >
> > Red Hat Linux 7 is 2.4-ready, 6.2 isn't.
>
> Could you specify a couple of things that could go wrong while running
> the 2.4 kernel on Red Hat 6.2?
LFS-support, ppp (that is also a RHL 7 issue), som
ubject: RE: kernel frustration
Yes, 6.2... I have installed all updates & security fixes to this point...
I can see no reason why anything would _not_ work on this kernel, as it's
only a kernel... Most everything else is its own process, running in it's
own memory space... The ke
ad teh /Changes doc and upgrade the proper packages.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nitebirdz
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: kernel frustration
>
>
&g
ware, & memory
management, AFAIK...
> -Original Message-
> From: mjs [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 5:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: kernel frustration
>
> is this on 6.2??...and did you have to upgrade certain packag
ECTED]'
Subject: RE: kernel frustration
I updated to kernel 2.4 last night... It seems to be working fine, at the
moment...
I will need to do a custom compile, of course...
> -Original Message-
> From: Nitebirdz [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kernel frustration
On 25 Feb 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> Red Hat Linux 7 is 2.4-ready, 6.2 isn't.
>
Could you specify a couple of things that could go wrong while running
the 2.4 kernel on Red Hat 6.2? Just out of curiosity, for the s
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Burke, Thomas G. wrote:
> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:01:36 -0500
> From: "Burke, Thomas G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: kernel frustr
ubject: Re: kernel frustration
>
> On 25 Feb 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> >
> > Red Hat Linux 7 is 2.4-ready, 6.2 isn't.
> >
>
>
> Could you specify a couple of things that could go wrong while running
> the 2.4 kernel on Red Hat 6.2?
On 25 Feb 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> Red Hat Linux 7 is 2.4-ready, 6.2 isn't.
>
Could you specify a couple of things that could go wrong while running
the 2.4 kernel on Red Hat 6.2? Just out of curiosity, for the sake of
learning. Thanks.
--
"digitalfrontier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> here is my senerio,..i'm currentely running Redhat 6.2 with kernel 2.2.17
> and i want to upgrade to kernel 2.4.0, is this possible?..do i need to be
> running Redhat 7.0 ??... i went ahead and ran
Red Hat Linux 7 is 2.4-ready, 6.2 isn't.
--
Tron
At 12:21 24.02.01 -0400, you wrote:
>You're right...my apologies.
>
>However, that being said, every reference I've seen in this list to
>compiling the kernel in the redhat lists I'm on have all included
>"make" as a step.
>
>A search of the archives should bear this out.
Isn't the question simp
You're right...my apologies.
However, that being said, every reference I've seen in this list to
compiling the kernel in the redhat lists I'm on have all included
"make" as a step.
A search of the archives should bear this out.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 10:08:58 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>Mic
Michael Burger wrote:
> Did you look in the README file?
>
> That's where I got it from, when I first started trying to install my
> 2.4.x kernels.
I would really like to see this README file you're talking about, because the
one that comes with the 2.4.x kernels doesn't have a separate 'make'
ke dep (and possibly make clean)
>make bzImage
>
>where does make come into the pictureand where does it state this???
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Burger
>Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001
ECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Burger
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 6:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kernel frustration
Any reason you didn't run "make" before "make bzImage"?
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 19:30:20 -0500, mjs wrote:
>
>here is my senerio,..i'm
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Statux
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 11:42 PM
> To: REDHAT . .
> Subject: Re: kernel frustration
>
>
> > here is my senerio,..i'm currentely running Redhat 6.2 with
PM
To: REDHAT . .
Subject: Re: kernel frustration
> here is my senerio,..i'm currentely running Redhat 6.2 with kernel 2.2.17
> and i want to upgrade to kernel 2.4.0, is this possible?..do i need to be
> running Redhat 7.0 ??... i went ahead and ran
You don't need 7.0. I have 6.2 and
Any reason you didn't run "make" before "make bzImage"?
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 19:30:20 -0500, mjs wrote:
>
>here is my senerio,..i'm currentely running Redhat 6.2 with kernel 2.2.17
>and i want to upgrade to kernel 2.4.0, is this possible?..do i need to be
>running Redhat 7.0 ??... i went ahead an
> here is my senerio,..i'm currentely running Redhat 6.2 with kernel 2.2.17
> and i want to upgrade to kernel 2.4.0, is this possible?..do i need to be
> running Redhat 7.0 ??... i went ahead and ran
You don't need 7.0. I have 6.2 and I have 2.4.x running off and on (off
and on because there is s
here is my senerio,..i'm currentely running Redhat 6.2 with kernel 2.2.17
and i want to upgrade to kernel 2.4.0, is this possible?..do i need to be
running Redhat 7.0 ??... i went ahead and ran
make menuconfig
make dep
all went fine,..but as soon as i ran
make bzImage i got this error
[root@di
here is my senerio,..i'm currentely running Redhat 6.2 with kernel 2.2.17
and i want to upgrade to kernel 2.4.0, is this possible?..do i need to be
running Redhat 7.0 ??... i went ahead and ran
make menuconfig
make dep
all went fine,..but as soon as i ran
make bzImage i got this error
[root@d
25 matches
Mail list logo
