Re: kernel: VM: terminating process X

2000-11-02 Thread Bret Hughes
Charles Galpin wrote: > mmh. your explanation make sense, but this box is a simple workstation > with 256MB of real RAM and 256MB of swap. It could conceivable be netscape > - I guess I'll keep an eye on memory usage.. > > thanks > I would be willing to bet that netscape is the culprit. I find t

Re: kernel: VM: terminating process X

2000-11-02 Thread Charles Galpin
mmh. your explanation make sense, but this box is a simple workstation with 256MB of real RAM and 256MB of swap. It could conceivable be netscape - I guess I'll keep an eye on memory usage.. thanks On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Bret Hughes wrote: > Charles Galpin wrote: > > > I have gotten this message

Re: kernel: VM: terminating process X

2000-11-02 Thread Bret Hughes
Charles Galpin wrote: > I have gotten this message a couple of times now. What is "VM" - virtual > memory? Why would the kernel be killing X? It has only happened while > idle. > > stock RH7.0, XFree86 3.x / matrox g400 In my experience it means something is chewing up memory and you ran out of

kernel: VM: terminating process X

2000-11-01 Thread Charles Galpin
I have gotten this message a couple of times now. What is "VM" - virtual memory? Why would the kernel be killing X? It has only happened while idle. stock RH7.0, XFree86 3.x / matrox g400 thanks charles ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]