* Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-20 08:53]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 20:39:07 -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
>
> > The following is a transcript of what I did. Can I assume that the
> > problem has now been fixed? If so, thanks a lot!!
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 20:39:07 -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
> The following is a transcript of what I did. Can I assume that the
> problem has now been fixed? If so, thanks a lot!!
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20:34:53 ~]$ su -
> Password:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20
* Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-19 17:08]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 09:45:10 -1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > > Test install failed because of package conflicts: file
> > > > /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 09:45:10 -1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Test install failed because of package conflicts: file
> > > /usr/kerberos/bin/sclient from install of krb5-server-1.2.7-14 conflicts
> > > with file from
the following error message when updating kerberos (using
> > up2date):
> >
> >
> >
> > Test install failed because of package conflicts: file
> > /usr/kerberos/bin/sclient from install of krb5-server-1.2.7-14 conflicts
> > with file from package krb5-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 10:19:14 -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
> Googling for help, I found one message previously posted to this list
> regarding the following error message when updating kerberos (using
> up2date):
>
>
>
>
* Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-18 17:13]:
> Marc Adler wrote:
> >
> >
> >Test install failed because of package conflicts: file
> >/usr/kerberos/bin/sclient from install of krb5-server-1.2.7-14 conflicts
> >with file from package kr
Marc Adler wrote:
Test install failed because of package conflicts: file
/usr/kerberos/bin/sclient from install of krb5-server-1.2.7-14 conflicts
with file from package krb5-devel-1.2.7-10
What's wrong and what should I do to fix the error and perform the
update success
Googling for help, I found one message previously posted to this list
regarding the following error message when updating kerberos (using
up2date):
Test install failed because of package conflicts: file
/usr/kerberos/bin/sclient from install of krb5-server-1.2.7-14 conflicts
with file
"Advisory ID RHSA-2003:222-01, Updated openssh packages" it
looks like user authentication via Kerberos has been broken. Logging on via
console still validates users correctly via Kerberos, but when using ssh it
does not function any more. After entering the username, no password can be
enter
26 PM
Subject: Re: Ssh , kerberos and advisory ID RHSA-2003:222-01
> Hi!
>
> I have the same problem!
> Seems like the new sshd segfaults when authenticating using pam_krb5.
> I posted a message about this a couple of days ago, but no replies so far.
>
> I down-graded to the previo
Hello,
After applying "Advisory ID RHSA-2003:222-01, Updated openssh packages" it
looks like user authentication via Kerberos has been broken. Logging on via
console still validates users correctly via Kerberos, but when using ssh it
does not function any more. After entering the us
be
in kerberos. Never tried to configure kerberos before, and the man page
does not tell me so much.
By changing the /etc/xinetd.d/gssftp from disable = no to disable=yes,
I got the message on the remote machine: Unknown message , can't log in.
Anyone having experience of config
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 06:15, Steven Hildreth wrote:
>
> I need to setup a single point authentication for my LAN/WAN.
You'll probably want to set up LDAP for name lookups to replace NIS, and
Kerberos for authentication.
LDAP, as a directory service, does not actively "aut
DC in that local Domain) using
the same single point authentication that the collection of Linux based
servers use?
I have read +/-'s about both LDAP and Kerberos authentication, and I am
wondering which has better real world application benefits for this
particular situation.
Thanks!
At 06:01 PM 12/18/01 -0600, you wrote:
>Ben, You are my hero.
LOL!
>You just keep plugging and learning. Keep it up!
Thanks. It won't be long before I'm semi-comfortable. But you should have
seen me about a year ago...
BenO
___
Redhat-list maili
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 07:01 pm, Bret Hughes wrote:
> Ben Ocean wrote:
> > Hi;
> > I've taken over a new RH71 box and I'm working with kerberos for the
> > first time. I've run into a strange problem (see be
Ben Ocean wrote:
>
> Hi;
> I've taken over a new RH71 box and I'm working with kerberos for the first
> time. I've run into a strange problem (see below) that I haven't been able
> to figure out so I thought I'd rebuild from source to be able to run make
At 03:33 PM 12/18/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>Make sure that your /etc/krb5.conf file contains the proper configuration
>for your KDC(s). If it's the proper config, perhaps something to do with
>name resolution. I understand that you are running kadmin on the Kerbero
At 08:59 AM 12/18/01 +1000, you wrote:
>On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 at 2:14pm (-0800), Ben Ocean wrote:
>
> > Hi;
> > I've taken over a new RH71 box and I'm working with kerberos for the first
> > time. I've run into a strange problem (see below) that I haven
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 at 2:14pm (-0800), Ben Ocean wrote:
> Hi;
> I've taken over a new RH71 box and I'm working with kerberos for the first
> time. I've run into a strange problem (see below) that I haven't been able
> to figure out so I thought I'd rebui
Hi;
I've taken over a new RH71 box and I'm working with kerberos for the first
time. I've run into a strange problem (see below) that I haven't been able
to figure out so I thought I'd rebuild from source to be able to run make
check, etc. But if I do this I'm g
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 03:15:35PM -0400, Duncan Hill wrote:
> Could someone give me a pointer as to whether the name Kerberos
> reflects a 3 way handshake, or the fact that 3 machines are involved?
The FAQ (http://www.nrl.navy.mil/CCS/people/kenh/kerberos-faq.html)
has this to say:
S
Could someone give me a pointer as to whether the name Kerberos
reflects a 3 way handshake, or the fact that 3 machines are involved?
--
Sapere aude
My mind not only wanders, it sometimes leaves completely.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL
How does one disable programs from trying to authenticate using Kerberos? Just
about everything on my system tries to authenticate using kerberos and I don't
use it... kinda aggravating, if ya ask me. :-) Probably my fault for enabling
something somewhere... :-)
I've got a RedHat 6.2 machine here... I'm trying to figure
out what config options I have to turn off to disable
attempting to use Kerberos authentication? It's causing
some aggravation here during testing of some software...
Thanks.
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, mint wrote:
> when i try to install krb5 libs on linux 6.1
> I get cannot find libphp3.a skipping
>
> when I try to unistall krb5 libs it says package not installed.
>
> when I try to install krb5 it says package already installed.
>
> help I am confused
>
One thing to remembe
when i try to install krb5 libs on linux 6.1
I get cannot find libphp3.a skipping
when I try to unistall krb5 libs it says package not installed.
when I try to install krb5 it says package already installed.
help I am confused
_
Get
when I try to install kerberos it says cannot find libphp3.so skipping anyone know why?
_
Get email for your site ---> http://www.everyone.net
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
when I try to install kerberos it say cannot find file libphp3.a skipping
please help
_
Get email for your site ---> http://www.everyone.net
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
Thanks,
that worked.
Tony
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How can I prevent ftp from using Kerberos?
Tony Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
7;AUTH GSSAPI': command not understood.
> 500 'AUTH KERBEROS_V4': command not understood.
> KERBEROS_V4 rejected as an authentication type
>
> How can I prevent ftp from issueing these commands?
By using /usr/bin/ftp, instead of /usr/kerberos/bin/ftp - if you're
Hello,
When connection to remote machines on our network using ftp,
I get the following message:
[root@user /usr]# ftp remote
Connected to remote.
220 bf001a FTP server (bf001a 2.1.3) ready.
500 'AUTH GSSAPI': command not understood.
500 'AUTH KERBEROS_V4': command not understood.
KERBEROS_V4 re
Hi
I'm setting up kerberos 5 on RedHat 6.1, and have a problem setting up ftp
service
I addedKadmin: princ host/fimee.ugto.mx ftp/fimee44.ugto.mx
telnet/fimee44.ugto.mx where: fimee44.ugto.mx is my host server and
my ftp server, and all worked well, all were created.
after t
accepted as authentication type
GSSAPI error major: Miscellaneous failure
GSSAPI error minor: No credentials cache file found
GSSAPI error: initializing context
GSSAPI authentication failed
334 Using authentication type KERBEROS_V4; ADAT must follow
KERBEROS_V4 accepted as authentication type
Kerberos
Hi all, I'm setting up kerberos on a bunch of RedHat 6.2 servers ,and one
RedHat 7 client.
Following the /usr/share/doc/krb* documentation I got the Kerberos server
up and running, and can kinit and grab tickets via a client on another
machine:
$ klist
Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5c
I am trying to compile php3 with redhat 6.2 and I get an error similar to
the following:
undefined symbol: gss_mech_krb5
Will I break anything in the imap package if I comment out the section
dealing with kerberos as I am not running kerberos or is there a better way
to fix this?
--
To
Got a question,
Does anyone have a good resource or know of a good resource on setting
up Kerberos? The other question is if you don't have a good source, how
do you shut it off when doing an rlogin? I have some systems to setup
with rlogin and evertime I remote login to them, I get a
just wondering if there is a more secure option than standard POP for
our off-site users to be checking mail with... eudora (client
favoured by our remote users) supports Kerberos and APOP - although
Kerberos "requires extra software"
So I was wondering if a) APOP is a secure (no
39 matches
Mail list logo
