More formally, the touch command will update a file with the current
timestamp. This will effectively create an empty file if one by the
specified name doesn't already exist. touch is often used with makefiles
to force rebuilds without going through the whole cleaning process (newer
Makefile i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> simply touch /var/log/boot.log and that message should go away. boot.log is
>
> what do you mean by "simply touch" (novice here)
>
Just type 'touch /var/log/boot.log' (you probably have to be su for that,
I'm not sure). The command touch will create an empty fil
> Unfortunately that message has absolutely nothing with your Ethernet ports.
> There are two things you should check. Do you have a /var/log directory?
yes
> If so, is there a boot.log in it? If there is a directory but no boot.log,
no boot.log file
> simply touch /var/log/boot.log and th
kage installed could
certainly create havoc...
.../Ed
Ed Wilts
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: editing eth1
> Ok, the eth0 por
Ok, the eth0 port does work. There is a light there. Also, when I log in as
root I am getting a mail message that says:
"errors rotating logs"
Then when I read the message it says:
"errors occurred while rotating /var/log/boot.log"
"stat of /var/log/boot.log failed: No such file or directory"
Is
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why is it that after I have made the changes to the network-scripts and have
> stopped and restarted the network I can't get the network to work. (It
> wasn't working beforehand either) Also, when I do netstat -nr it gives me a
> different ip addres
Not to start a holy war, here, but it is never a better idea to use
Linuxconf. Red Hat is deprecating it from their distribution, mainly due to
the user complaints, which have stemmed from Linuxconf's propensity to
overwrite certain customized configuration files with whatever it felt like
us
Why is it that after I have made the changes to the network-scripts and have
stopped and restarted the network I can't get the network to work. (It
wasn't working beforehand either) Also, when I do netstat -nr it gives me a
different ip address than the one in the ifcfg-eth0 file, this being the
c
A better idea would be to use Linuxconf. It usually works for most
simple tasks.
-- Jonathan
--
Jonathan M. Slivko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
'Life is the art of drawing without an eraser.' - John Gardner
-- Original Message --
From: "Anthony E. Greene" <[EMA
At 08:58 2/26/2002 -0800, Redhat wrote:
>I am trying to edit the two ethernet ports on my machine. I
>want to change the ip address of both ports but it is not
>happening when I use netconfig. This is a text based
>machine. Is there another command to directly change each
>port?
Edit /etc/sysconf
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Redhat wrote:
> I am trying to edit the two ethernet ports on my machine. I
> want to change the ip address of both ports but it is not
> happening when I use netconfig. This is a text based
> machine. Is there another command to directly change each
> port?
One way
cd
Newbie question:
I am trying to edit the two ethernet ports on my machine. I
want to change the ip address of both ports but it is not
happening when I use netconfig. This is a text based
machine. Is there another command to directly change each
port?
__
12 matches
Mail list logo
